3
$\begingroup$

My understanding is that heat is essentially atomic vibrations. If there are almost no atoms, how can there be residual heat?

Also, as I understand in space there is no heat transfer via convection and it is mainly through EM radiation. In this case, why is it that if i were to go into space with no suit and just an airtight helmet through which I could breathe, I would still freeze to death very quickly?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is not only atoms that have temperature. Not withstanding that the first rigorous definition that many people get involves the energy of atoms. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Oct 17 '15 at 20:09
7
$\begingroup$

When we refer to the 3 K of temperature in space, we don't mean atomic vibrations. The so called temperature arises, when you look at the sky and measure the radiation, which comes to us from every direction. If you cancel all stars, galaxies and other major light sources you will still "see" very isotropic microwave radiation. And this radiation is distributed like the radiation of a black body at a temperature of 2.73 K ($\approx$ 3 K).

So where does this radiation comes from? As you may know, we live in a accelerating universe, which means it is getting bigger with time. So if we reverse the time, we have a shrinking universe. But when every length scale decreases, so does the wavelength of the photons in the universe. By that logic the average frequency, and thus the energy, of a photon was large in the past.

Now there was a time, when the average energy of a photon was so high, that there couldn't be stable atoms, since every atom-photon interaction would be so strong, that the electrons would instantly leave the atom. The universe had to increase and cool until it reached a energy of about 3000 K. Now there could be stable atoms. The photons we are seeing today, are photons which got scattered the last time at this very moment! But since many billion years have pasted, their wavelength has further increased and instead of photons with a spectrum of a black body with 3000 K, we see a 1000 times cooler spectrum, which let's us extrapolate the time of the last scattering to about 380000 years after the big bang (or 13.4 billion years ago).

Your second question can be answered under many different aspects. The first I personally find quite funny: actually you are not freezing to death, you are boiling! Since there is no outer pressure in space the boiling point of your body fluids would rapidly decrease under your body temperature. In the first moment your fluids will go partially into gas phase and will damage your tissue by the increasing volume and pressure. But don't worry, you won't explode.

In the next step your body fluid would have lost so much temperature and energy due to the boiling process, that they would actually starts freezing. But this hasn't be the case for your hole body. As you have said, the only form of heat exchange in space is through radiation, and our body looses only a negligible part of it's heat this way. But we absorb pretty much every radiation! So under direct sunlight your back would heat up to a few 100$^\circ$ C (above the boiling point of water) while your front is below 0$^\circ$ C (below the freezing point of water). Never the less, you would be dead in less then a minute, but you could die on both ways at the same time!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The temperature in "space" isn't 3K. There are plenty of atoms (actually more ions and electrons) to which it is perfectly possible to ascribe a temperature.

If we measure the temperature (using various clever spectral diagnostics) we find that the interplanetary medium has temperatures ranging from millions of K near the Sun to around 100,000 K at the edge of the solar system.

The interstellar medium has temperatures ranging from a few K in the cores of the coldest molecular clouds to millions of K in the hot, ionised bubbles caused by supernova remnants.

Even the space between galaxies is hot, with temperatures of 100,000 to 10,000,000 K.

You are confusing the temperature of the cosmic microwave background with the temperature in space. But the gas and dust in space is not in equilibrium with this radiation. There are numerous heating mechanisms (e.g. stellar radiation and winds, supernovae) that keep things hot and the cooling mechanisms are not fast enough to get the temperature down to 3 K.

For the last part of your question - see manthano's answer. The low pressure in space means your bodily fluids would boil.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Re your last paragraph, this, this and this suggest that the bodily-fluid-boiling scenario is a bit of an exaggeration. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Oct 18 '15 at 13:18
0
$\begingroup$

Space is filled with the cosmic microwave background. The frequencies of the photons are very well described by a black body distribution which is can have a temperature associated with it. As in the case of atoms, the higher the temperature the more high energy photons there are.

$\endgroup$

protected by Qmechanic Oct 17 '15 at 21:15

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.