2
$\begingroup$

We have an ideal gas enclosed in cylinder whose top is covered by a piston of certain weight $mg$. At this stage, the piston is at rest which means the force by which the gas acts on the piston ($F=PA$ where $P$ is the gas pressure and $A$ is the cross sectional area of the cylinder) is equal to $mg$.

Now if this system was subject to an isobaric process, then its temperature and volume change with its pressure held constant(suppose $T$ and $V$ increase). But this is confusing, since during the process the piston is continuously changing its position, which implies it's being acted upon by a certain net force; Now the weight of the piston $mg$ is constant, so the force $F=PA$ by which the gas acts on the piston must have increased, but since $A$ is constant, therefore $P$ must have increased; therefore $P$ is not constant.

So How isobaric process is physically possible?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

But this is confusing, since during the process the piston is continuously changing its position, which implies its being acted upon by a certain net force

This is actually true.

To clarify, Newton's 1st law says: $pA-mg=0$. By decreasing e.i. temperature, volume will decrease and the piston moves. To start moving there must be acceleration. That means, as you rigthfully say, you must have $pA-mg=ma$ with an acceleration $a\neq 0$ present. And this will necessarily change $p$, since all other values are constant.

Usually in textbook problems you will often see a sentence like, "if the piston is moved slowly" or "if the temperature is raised slowly" or similar. This is simply to avoid this contradiction. If the piston moves slowly, then the acceleration is still $a\approx 0$ and negligible.

So yes, you are certainly right: A proces giving change in volume can only be truly isobaric if it is infinitely slow. The faster the piston moves, the less accurate our isobaric model is.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And elementary thermodynamics assumes infinitely slow processes anyway (as we assume to move through equilibrium states). $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10, 2015 at 17:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.