2
$\begingroup$

It is strange that all books I walked through, non of them explains or motivates how physicists realised that we need to deal with fields instead of particles.

Maybe the closest thing I found is the fact Dirac equation tells us that no singular particles can exists alone, but this still seems to be not a good motivation, why we need to replace wave functions with fields, and some parameters to operators, and indices to variables etc...

Anybody knows how this is realised/developed?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you read Weinberg? $\endgroup$ – Prahar Oct 3 '15 at 17:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar: No, I don't have it, can you explain it please? $\endgroup$ – TMS Oct 3 '15 at 17:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well, Weinberg spends the first 5 chapters of his book discussing just how fields come into the picture. I cannot do justice to it here. I would suggest that you go read that book for that. It's Steven Weinberg "Quantum Theory of Fields Volume 1". $\endgroup$ – Prahar Oct 3 '15 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar Oh, so it is a long story, Ok will try to find it, thx. $\endgroup$ – TMS Oct 3 '15 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/26960/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Oct 3 '15 at 18:52
3
$\begingroup$

Fields in QFT have a particle content too, so the field is not replacing particles, they are just described in a different way as the possible modes of vibration of the field. Now fields originate in classical physics, most notably with the work of Maxwell. It was then realised that a field solves many problems, like instantaneous interactions at a distance, and provide a reservoir of energy and momentum that gets transmitted through waves. This is where the particle interpretation settles in, as the interaction is carried by a quantum intrinsically associated to the field.

Another problem that is solved by fields is that when relativistic effects are considered, the notion of particle is not well-defined. Suppose you want to describe a particle that is decaying. You start with a system described by a particle in a certain state and you end up with a different final state with a different particle content. Hence it is difficult to attach a state to a particle that after a while disappears. What has not changed is the total energy and momentum of the system, and this can be explained as different fields that communicate their energy and momentum among themselves through the way the interact with each other.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.