It is known that the different spatial components of the angular momentum don't commute with each other. $$ [L_x,L_y] \propto L_z \\ [L_y,L_z] \propto L_x \\ [L_z,L_x] \propto L_y $$ Also it is known that the uncertainty depends on the commutator. $$ \Delta L_x \Delta L_y \geq \frac{1}{2} \lvert \langle[L_x,L_y]\rangle\rvert $$ This makes me wonder. Knowing, say, $L_z$, how does one put a number on the uncertainty in $L_y$?

For 1D it is straightforward. $$ \Delta p = \frac{\hbar}{\Delta x} $$ I can figure out $\Delta x$, width of the slit, for example, and then know the uncertainty in $p$.

However, to determine the uncertainty in $L_y$ , I need to know $L_x$, but because I know $L_z$ there is uncertainty associated with knowing $L_x$ proportional to $L_y$, since $ [L_z,L_x] \propto L_y $. But I don't know $L_y$!

How would you figure this out?


For the angular momentum there is no lower bound for the product $(\Delta L_a)_\psi (\Delta L_b)_\psi$ differently from $x$ and $p$. Indeed there are states $\psi$ such that $L_a\psi =0$ for $a=x,y,z$ simultaneously. I am referring to the states with $L^2\psi =0$ which imply $$(\Delta L_a)_\psi (\Delta L_b)_\psi=0$$ So you cannot write something like $$ (\Delta L_x)_\psi (\Delta L_y)_\psi \geq k$$ for any constant $k>0$ independent from the state $\psi$ as it happens for $x$ and $p$. From this example you can see how, generally speaking, there exist simultaneous eigenstates of incompatible observables, even if you cannot find an orthonormal (Hilbert) basis of these vectors.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.