2
$\begingroup$

If I understand correctly the electromagnetic field strength tensor $ F_{\mu\nu}$ could be considered as a spin-1 field. In that case, what can one say about the total spin and the $z$-component of the spin for this field? Also, how is $F_{\mu\nu}$'s spin related to that of the photon field ($A_{\mu}$)?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's the gauge field $A_{\mu}$ that has spin 1. (The gauge bosons have spin one.) The field strength tensor itself is not a gauge field! $\endgroup$ – psm Sep 24 '15 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ Don't forget pair production or atomic orbitals where electrons "exist as standing waves". See this gif and try to envisage a wave in a tight closed path. IMHO you should think of the electron's Fµv field as a spin-½ standing-wave "spinor" configuration of the spin-1 Aµ photon wave. $\endgroup$ – John Duffield Sep 24 '15 at 13:35
1
$\begingroup$

The spin of the electromagnetic field tensor $F_{\mu\nu}$ is best understood by writing it as a spinor. A spin 1 field is a represented by a symmetric spinor $\xi^{AB}$ or by a dotted symmetric spinor $\eta_{\dot{A}\dot{B}}$. In order to get the field transforming correctly under parity, the electromagnetic field has to be a direct sum using the symmetric spinor and it's complex conjugate dotted spinor. \begin{equation} F_{\mu\nu} \sim \xi^{AB}\oplus [\xi^{*}]_{\dot{A}\dot{B}} \end{equation} The symmetric spinor $\xi^{AB}$ has three independent complex components $\xi^{11},\xi^{12}=\xi^{21},\xi^{22}$. Linear combinations of these components correspond to the three complex components of the electromagnetic field $B^{r}+iE^{r}$. The source free Maxwell equations are obtained by acting on the symmetric spinor with the Hermitian momentum operator $\hat{p}^{\dot{A}}_{\ B}$ \begin{equation} \hat{p}^{\dot{A}}_{\ B}\xi^{BC}=0 \end{equation} This equation is similar to the Dirac equation for a massive spin 1/2 field. The photon is massless, so it has helicity = $\pm 1$ instead of spin (essentially spin 1 along or against the direction of flight). The photon has two helicity degrees of freedom, but the spin 1 field $F_{\mu\nu} \sim \xi^{AB}\oplus [\xi^{*}]_{\dot{A}\dot{B}}$ has six real components. The Maxwell equations $\hat{p}^{\dot{A}}_{\ B}\xi^{BC}=0$ project the spinor onto a two-dimensional subspace.

This is as far as I know how to answer the question at present. The gauge field $A^{\mu}$ is a four vector so it ought to be a Hermitian spinor field of type $X^{\dot{A}}_{\ B}$ which is the tensor product of two spin 1/2 fields. It has four components, so the gauge fixing must come in to reduce four to the two helicity degrees of freedom.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Stephen. Thanks for your kind response. So, it seems one can not easily visualize how the spin of $F_{\mu\nu}$ is related to that of $A_{\mu}$. However, I'm interested to know how does the spin of $F_{\mu\nu}$ couples to that of charged fermions in a magnetic interaction: $\bar\psi\sigma^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}\psi$ (where $\sigma^{\mu\nu}$ is the Lorentz generator). In the case of charged fermion and photon interaction: $\bar\psi\sigma^{\mu}A_{\mu}\psi$ the spins of the fermions add up to give the spin of the photon. Is this the case for the magnetic interaction involving $F_{\mu\nu}$? $\endgroup$ – physics_2015 Sep 26 '15 at 4:23
  • $\begingroup$ @physics_2015 : $F_{\mu\nu}$ is a pure spin 1 field. $A_{\mu}$ is a tensor product of two spin 1/2 fields so it is a direct sum of a spin 0 and a spin 1. The spin 0 field must (I guess) be removed by the gauge fixing. I'm interested in these questions as well. I don't understand the way you couple the fermion field to the gauge field, I would write it $e\bar{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}\psi$. Would you explain this to me? $\endgroup$ – Stephen Blake Sep 26 '15 at 5:59
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Stephen, I was using the Weyl representation notation. So I was referring to the following coupling $\chi^{\dagger}\sigma^{\mu}A_{\mu}\chi$ where $\chi$ is a Weyl spinor. $\endgroup$ – physics_2015 Sep 27 '15 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.