1
$\begingroup$

A baseball moving sufficiently close to the speed of light could theoretically spend less than a nanosecond inside of the Sun in the balls frame. If a baseball were traveling close enough to the speed of light, could it pass through the Sun?

Edit: Imagine a single proton traveling with 1 TeV of relativistic kinetic energy. It can and does pass right through a human body without fusing, stoping or destroying the person and so on. Now imagine a baseball with enough energy that a single layer of the Sun only one atom in thickness can be easily penetrated without taking away all of the relativistic momentum of the particles constituting the baseball. Then imagine the scenario again with two atom thickness and the required energy to penetrate that layer. Then continue this exercise until a baseball passes through the Sun. If you think that it would "burn up" how would its 4 momentum be conserved? I think it's just a matter of what velocity is required to make it to the other side.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ A reminder that questions shouldn't be answered in the comment section. I've deleted some comments. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 20:59

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

No, it could not. The issue of how much time it spends inside the sun is not relevant, even though it at first might seem so. A baseball at rest inside the sun for a sufficiently short time would only experience a very short exposure to the "normal" (at rest with respect to the sun) thermal and radiative effects that exposure, and so would be OK. If the baseball were traveling at relativistic velocities, though, the particles constituting the sun would, relative to the baseball, be slamming into it at the speed of light. This would cause lots of awful things for the baseball. For one, some of the particles hitting the approaching surface of the baseball would undergo nuclear fusion with it. For another, there would be significant spallation chewing away at the approaching surface of the ball. It would basically be the same as Randall Munroe describes in his first XKCD What-If. So even though the baseball would only be exposed to the sun for a very short time, the processes destroying the baseball due to its relativistic collision would also proceed very quickly, so the baseball will still not have a good time.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ What if the baseball's relativistic mass were a trillion times the rest mass of the Sun? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Alex It seems that you want the conditions under a ball could pass through the sun. I suggest to edit your question. Also, your question is quantifiable, you could make a short calculation to get the answer. $\endgroup$
    – Ana S. H.
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 16:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Alex Then it's not a baseball. $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 16:55
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Alex At that point it 1) it is the most massive thing in the solar system, and 2) probably a black hole. I haven't looked at the schwarzschild radius for something that massive, but something a trillion times the rest mass of the sun crammed into a baseball sized sphere sounds a lot like a black hole. *wait, relativistic mass.. Right. So this may not apply :) $\endgroup$
    – CoilKid
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ @HDE226868 hilarious one, indeed $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 26 at 13:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.