12
$\begingroup$

In a particular textbook, the work function of a metal (in the context of the photoelectric effect) is defined as:

the minimum amount of energy necessary to remove a free electron from the surface of the metal

This sounds similar to ionisation energy, which is:

the amount of energy required to remove an electron from an atom or molecule in the gaseous state

These two energies are generally different. For instance, Copper has a work function of about 4.7eV but has a higher ionisation energy of about 746kJ mol-1 or 7.7eV.

I've sort of figured it's because the work function deals with free electrons whilst ionisation is done with a valence electron still bound within the atom. Is the difference due to the energy required to overcome the attraction of the positive nucleus?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

On first reading they do sound similiar, but they are entirely independent energies and concepts.

The work function of a metal refers to the minimum energy required to release an electron from the surface of a metal by a photon of light. The work function will vary from metal to metal. You might have a read of these: Compton Effect, this previous answer, Work function 1 and this Wikipedia article Work Function 2.

enter image description here

The Ionization energy is the energy needed to release electrons from their bound states around atoms, it will vary with each particular atom, with one outer electron around that atom needing less energy to release it than a lower, more closely bound electron, which requires greater energy because of the greater electrostatic force holding it closer to the nucleus.

Also, to complicate things, you need to allow for the Shielding Effect of Inner Electrons

enter image description here

Periodic trends for ionization energy (IE) vs. proton number: note that within each of the seven periods the IE (colored circles) of an element begins at a minimum for the first column of the Periodic table (the alkali metals), and progresses to a maximum for the last column (the noble gases) which are indicated by vertical lines and labelled with a noble gas element symbol, and which also serve as lines dividing the 7 periods. Note that the maximum ionization energy for each row diminishes as one progresses from row 1 to row 7 in a given column, due to the increasing distance of the outer electron shell from the nucleus as inner shells are added.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would say that it is correct to interpret the binding energy as the energy needed to bring an electron to the Fermi level, and the work function as the energy needed to bring an electron from the Fermi level to the vacuum level? $\endgroup$ – Francesco Boccardo Jun 2 '18 at 9:36
5
$\begingroup$

The energies and Workfunctions of the elements named in the table above

There is defenitely a relation between Workfunction and ionisation of the elements. See figure in which I plotted the Workfunction (blue) and ionisation (yellow) of the elements named in the table of the former answer. ionisation vs Work

If you plot them against eachother it shows an definite though loose relatinship. I bet there really is a relation between the two, but I do not know exactly what it is and why it exists

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.