When we apply parity on a field two times, we demand that we should get back the same field. This gives us, $P^{2} =1$, which implies, $ P \psi = e^{i \theta} \psi$ . This extra phase factor is called intrinsic parity. Now, this is not just a phase factor. It is important because it's value decided whether a spin 0 field is a scalar or Pseudo-scalar. But what exactly is intrinsic parity ? On what properties of field it depends?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would like to add a question to this. If I consider an interaction , say $l_{int}=\bar\psi \psi \phi$, it can be shown that it is invariant under parity operation, given that scalar is intrinsic scalar. Now, does it mean that a pseudo scalar can not interact through this lagrangian term. OR it can interact but will not be preserved under parity? $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2015 at 8:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ More on intrinsic parity. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Oct 26, 2016 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ "does it mean that a pseudo scalar can not interact through this lagrangian term": pseudo scalar Yukawa-type interaction is perfectly legit, see here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/459043/… $\endgroup$
    – MadMax
    Nov 20, 2020 at 17:13

1 Answer 1


You are viewing this the wrong way. If you apply parity operation to a scalar field (both real and complex field), you have: $$ P\phi (x) P^{-1} = n_P\phi (\tilde{x}) \tag{1} $$ where, $n_P$ is the intrinsic parity,

and the parity operator effects the coordinate transformation from $x$ to $\tilde{x} = (t, -\boldsymbol{x})$.

Now, if you apply the parity operation again, $$ P^2\phi (x) P^{-2} = n_P P\phi (\tilde{x}) P^{-1} = n_P^2 \phi (x) $$ We should obtain the original field back. Thus, we see that $n_P^2 = 1$, which can only imply that $n_P = \pm 1$.

We cannot determine intrinsic parity with free Lagrangian; for that, we need interactions. Suppose you have an interaction Lagrangian of the form, $$ L_{int} = - \mu \phi^3 - \lambda \phi^4 $$ Applying the parity transformation on the interaction Lagrangian, and subsequently using Eqn. (1) for each $\phi$, we see that parity invariance would require that for the first term, $n_P^3 = 1$, and for the second term $n_P^4 = 1$. Both of these equations are satisfied simultaneously only if $n_P = 1$. Hence, for this case, $\phi$ is a scalar field.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.