It seems like the lack of atmosphere should not be playing a role in the diurnal temperature variation because that's what makes it colder. Mountains are not that dry, usually.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It may be better to ask this over at earthscience.stackexchange.com $\endgroup$ – Isopycnal Oscillation Sep 3 '15 at 5:48
  • $\begingroup$ You have to take radiation cooling and heating into account. The temperature of free space is given by the radiation that's in it, which moves at the speed of light, i.e. without matter a volume of space with dimension $L$ "cools and heats up" on a timescale that is given by $L/c$. Throw matter in there and now you have much slower heating and cooling because the effective speed of light is much, much smaller as photons are absorbed and re-emitted many times before they can escape to the vacuum. $\endgroup$ – CuriousOne Sep 3 '15 at 13:49

The answer is in the EM absorption/emission profile of the atmosphere with height. Visible wavelengths pass through the atmosphere unheeded, except for clouds. IR is somewhat absorbed by carbon dioxide. That same carbon dioxide emits IR radiation too, allowing it to cool. Atmospheric parcels at higher elevations have less intervening carbon dioxide between them and cold black space. This means faster cooling, but the effect is not very strong.

At very high altitudes, a different process dominates. UV light is absorbed high in the atmosphere. Although there is much less UV light from the sun than visible light, the part of the atmosphere effected is very low density, so that UV can have a large effect.

Even further up, X-rays and solar wind charged particles cause ionization and a huge amount of heating. Charged particles interact at the magnetic poles (auroras). X-rays and hard UV hit the day side, cause a big diurnal perturbation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.