How do I write the wave function of hydrogen atom taking into consideration of nucleus spin? For example consider $2S_{\frac{1}{2}}$ state with nucleus spin $I$, then wave function $\psi=\langle2S_{\frac{1}{2}},F,F_{3}|$ where $F$ is the total angular momentum of hydrogen atom $F=J+I$ and $F_{3}$ is the projection of it along z axis. Now what will be the explicit form of the wave function? Thanks in advance.

  • $\begingroup$ The eigen numbers of orbital and internal momenta are not additive (unlike the operators), i.e. $F \neq J + I$; $\hat{\mathbf{F}} = \hat{\mathbf{J}} + \hat{\mathbf{I}}$; $F_3 = J_3 + I_3$ $\endgroup$ – Maksim Zholudev Feb 1 '12 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ Does "the wave function" mean "the wave functions of energy eigenstates"? Or does it mean "any wave function"? $\endgroup$ – Steve Byrnes Feb 2 '12 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ wave functions of energy eigenstates.More precisely it's the parity violating hamiltonian of hydrogen atom,I need to calculate the matrix element between the states of $2S_{\frac{1}{2}}$ and $2P_{\frac{1}{2}}$ states The eigenstates are $<2S_{\frac{1}{2}},F,F_{3}|$ and $<2P_{\frac{1}{2}},F',F'_{3}|$ $\endgroup$ – WInterfell Feb 3 '12 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ What is $\hat{\mathbf{J}}$ here? Is it the orbital momentum of the electron, nucleus or whole atom? Does the nucleus have zero orbital momentum? $\endgroup$ – Maksim Zholudev Feb 12 '12 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ No $\hat{J}$ is the total angular momentum of the electron and nucleus have zero angular momentum. $\endgroup$ – WInterfell Feb 12 '12 at 20:48

The easy way

If we do not take into account the dependence of the electron state on the spin state of the nucleus, the wavefunction is just a product of electron and nucleus wavefunctions: $$ \psi = \psi_e(\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{R}) \psi_n(\mathbf{R}) $$ Both are spinors of rank 1 (columns of functions). The spinor $\psi_e$ consists of two components. The number of the components of $\psi_n$ depends on the total spin of the nucleus $I$ and is equal to $2I+1$.

The hard way

If the spin of the nucleus affects the electron state, then the total wavefunction is a spinor of rank 2 i.e. a table of functions with dimensions $2 \times (2I+1)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Does the non additivity of $\hat{F}$ is the consequence of not using Born Oppenheimer approximation? $\endgroup$ – WInterfell Feb 1 '12 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ @user7429, the operators are additive. The numbers $J$ and $I$ are not. The eigen number of $\hat{\mathbf{F}}^2$ is $F(F+1)$. Here is one of the definitions of $F$. The same for $J$ and $I$. So the sum $J+I$ is not $F$ even though the sum of operators $\hat{\mathbf{J}}$ and $\hat{\mathbf{I}}$ is the operator $\hat{\mathbf{F}}$. $\endgroup$ – Maksim Zholudev Feb 2 '12 at 8:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.