I'm studying QM from Sakurai, and I have a doubt regarding the proof given that in the case of time independent Hamiltonian the expectation value of an observable doesn't change with time. The argument goes as follows:

At any time the expectation value of an observable $B$ is given by:


Where $U$ is the time evolution operator and $|\alpha_0>$ is the ket in our initial state. Suppose that $|\alpha_0>$ is also an eigenket of some other operator $A$ (which commutes with the Hamiltonian operator), that the Hilbert space is finite-dimensional and that the eigenkets of $A$ form a basis of the Hilbert space. We can use the explicit form of the time evolution operator:


And we know that it acts on the eigenkets of $A$ by multiplication by a phase. Sakurai then writes this:


My doubt is: the observable $B$ could send the ket $|\alpha_0>$ in a superposition of eigenkets, and then the simple multiplication by $\exp{\frac{iE_{\alpha_0}t}{\hbar}}$ wouldn't hold anymore. What am I missing?


1 Answer 1


The left exponential evolves the $\langle \alpha_0 \lvert$ on the left.

This is one of the pitfalls of Dirac notation, it would be unambiguous to write $$ (\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}E_{\alpha_0} t} \lvert \alpha_0 \rangle,B \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}E_{\alpha_0} t} \lvert \alpha_0 \rangle)$$ where $(\dot{},\dot{})$ denotes the inner product on the Hilbert space, i.e. $(\lvert\psi\rangle,\lvert\phi\rangle) = \langle \psi\vert\phi \rangle$.

  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, makes sense. Thank you! (I'll accept as soon as possible and I guess the lesson is: when in doubt, rewrite everything in inner product notation) $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2015 at 15:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.