2
$\begingroup$

I am reading the book "Topological insulator: Dirac equation in condensed matters" by Shun-Qing Sheng. I do not know much about this topic and this is the first time I am confronted with it, so this might be an easy question: On page 15, chapter 2, the Jackiw-Rebbi Solution in one dimension is presented. It is assumed that there are two regions: one with positive mass and one with negative mass.

What is the interpretation of this negative mass? Why is there such a thing as an negative mass? Is this related to the negative energy interpretation in the Dirac equation (Dirac sea/anti-particles)?

The concept of negative masses seems to be widely accepted in this part of physics, since there are a lot papers which assume similar things (for example here).

EDIT: Here is a scan of the mentioned section from Sheng's book:

Scan of the aforementioned book

EDIT 2: Maybe it would help, if someone could explain to me the term "topological mass" as I suppose this is what is meant.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You can find an excellent description of what a topological insulator is in this brief presentation from the Yazdani Group at Princeton: Topological Insulators.

To answer your question on the meaning of negative effective mass:

The effective mass is actually determined by the behavior of the energy levels $E({\bf k})$ as functions of the crystal wave vector ${\bf k}$ in the Brillouin cell. If an energy level has a local minimum, usually at the center of the cell, it can be approximated to second order in ${\bf k}$ by an expression of the form
$$ E({\bf k}) = E_0 + \frac{\hbar^2 {\bf k}^2}{2 m_{eff}} $$ where the expansion coefficient $\frac{\hbar^2}{2 m_{eff}}$ is written so that the entire expression becomes analogous to the kinetic energy formula ${\bf p}^2/2m$ for ${\bf p}= \hbar {\bf k}$. By identification, the scalar $m_{eff}$ plays the role of a "mass" and is therefore called the "effective mass". At first sight it simply tells how strongly does the energy vary with ${\bf k}$ in the Brillouin cell, but it does act like a mass in many calculations, so the name is justified. Note that the above expansion is the simplest possible. It often happens that $m_{eff}$ is a symmetric tensor, which after diagonalization supplies different effective masses along 3 orthogonal ${\bf k}$ directions (anisotropy of energy levels and effective mass).

In a normal insulator, the energy levels behave largely as above and exhibit a positive effective mass. In a topological insulator, conducting and valence energy levels become inverted in the center of the Brillouin cell (see reference for more details), such that the valence levels become concave, like a "sad parabola", and display a local maximum. Their expansion becomes
$$ E({\bf k}) = E_0 - \frac{\hbar^2 {\bf k}^2}{2 m_{eff}} $$

and exhibits "negative effective mass", with all the interesting consequences that follow.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the link and the explanation! However, in semiconductors one also finds the same shape of the bands: the valence band is a "sad" parabola and the conducting band is a "happy" parabola (I like the way you wrote that ;) ). The negative mass in the v-band is there turned into a positive mass by introducing holes with positive charge. The bandstructure looks then very similar to image b) in the linked article. What is the big difference? $\endgroup$
    – Merlin1896
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 9:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Merlin1896 Your observation is correct. The difference is the topology (twists) of the energy surfaces, which determines the number of Kramer state pairs in edge modes. If the total number $Z_2$ of edge Kramers pairs is even (0,2,...), the crystal is a regular insulator, if $Z_2$ is odd (1) it is a topological insulator. In the latter case the edge states become symmetry protected for lack of other states to transition into (see their spin). You may be interested in science.uva.nl/research/cmp/TI.html and arxiv.org/pdf/1002.3895v2. $\endgroup$
    – udrv
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.