A group of astronomers in September 2014 redefined what classifies a supercluster. Before this, the supercluster where the Milky Way resides was the Virgo Supercluster. Now, the Virgo Supercluster & three other previously defined superclusters are simply 4 lobes of the newly-defined Laniakea Supercluster.
To my understanding, this redefinition was prompted by the new information that outside of the Virgo Supercluster, the other 3 nearby superclusters are themselves being gravitationally pulled by & have "peculiar" velocity in the direction of the Great Attractor (in the center of the Virgo Supercluster). Therefore these 4 superclusters together form a loose structure that has been deemed a more fitting definition of a supercluster.
While I'm comfortable with that logic, I don't understand why the Virgo Supercluster & the other 3 still are known as superclusters. Laniakea essentially is a supercluster that contains superclusters, by that reasoning. It seems contradictory to make a new definition that overrides the last, yet have the last definition still apply.
So, what was the previous definition of a supercluster, & is there a verbatim updated definition for new superclusters somewhere? Is it possible for these both to apply simultaneously?