I get confused with the concept of resonance. Many materials suggest that in order to achieve resonance, the system must undergo simple harmonic force ($F=F_0\sin(\omega t)$), and at the natural frequency. However, it is too hard to obtain the simple harmonic force, and most of the natural phenomenons involving resonance do not need this kind of force either. So what is the exact condition for resonance to happen? Does it only need to be influenced by a force at a natural frequency, no matter what type of force is it?

In particular, there is a question about it: the old man carries a bucket of water on the back of his bike. He travels at a constant speed in a straight line. Assuming holes on the street are aligned the same distance from each other. Then at what velocity does the man bike that the water suffes from resonance? I need a clear explanation.

  • $\begingroup$ I think this question would be a good question if it did not have the second paragraph on the example. Would you consider editing it? $\endgroup$ – Bernhard Aug 15 '15 at 19:03

For resonance to occur you must have

(1) A 'system' capable of 'ringing'. Ringing means that the system has internal structure that can admit energy from outside the system and which allows energy to move about within the system in a periodic manner. The harmonic oscillator is an example of a linear system that is capable of ringing, but the system does not necessarily need to be linear.

(2) A source of energy. You will often see written that the energy input has to be of the same frequency as the natural frequency of the system. But that's not always the case. Sometimes the internal structure of the system has means of converting the external source of energy into energy at the natural frequency. Or the input energy could consist of broad band energy containing a small component of frequency at the natural frequency of the system. A resonant system can feed off of this energy.

(3) Minimal energy loss. The internal structure of the system must be such that the rate of energy loss is no greater than the rate of energy input. Otherwise the internal flow of energy, the ringing state, will eventually diminish. If the rate of energy input exceeds the rate of energy loss, real systems (which are nonlinear) will eventually reach a limit of energy capacity. This usually leads to a change in the system structure (the system 'breaks') and resonance may cease.

As for your specific problem ask yourself does the man-bike-water bucket system have the ability to ring? Generally you need some way to move input energy from a potential to a kinetic state. Next you need to ask at what linear speed does the impact of the tires on the bumps create energy input that can excite the system.


The key tool that makes resonance applicable to many general situations is the concept of Fourier series.

It's mathematically much easier to analyse the motion of oscillators when the driving force is simple harmonic. You can work out how much the oscillator is driven and what the steady state amplitude is. In fact, for a oscillator with natural frequency $\omega_0$ and driven by a force $F=F_0\sin{\omega t}$, and damped by a factor 2$\gamma$, the equation of motion is $$ \ddot{x} + 2\gamma\dot{x} + \omega_0x = F_0\sin{\omega t}, $$ This leads to a resulting amplitude of $$ \frac{F_0/m}{\sqrt{(\omega_0^2 - \omega^2)^2 + 4\gamma^2\omega^2}}, $$ at the same frequency as the driving force.

So the first thing to realise is that you don't need a driving force that's exactly at the natural frequency - the closer to the natural frequency the higher your resulting amplitude will be, but it's not the case that there's no response at all until your driving force is exactly the same as the natural frequency. You can work out the response to your oscillator of any driving frequency, and there is no sharp point where the oscillator is 'in resonance': it's affected to a driving force of any frequency, to a larger or smaller degree.

So if you have multiple frequencies driving your oscillator, you can add them up (as the oscillator is linear), and get some complex motion that's the sum of many sinusoidal responses of various amplitudes. But it's not too hard to get a computer to just add them all up.

Now we can work out the response of the oscillator to any sinusoidal driving force, or any sum of sinusoids. The real power comes when we realise we can (more or less) represent any periodic function as a sum of sinusoids. For instance, take the function in black below, a square wave: enter image description here

Also on the sketch is outlined several sums of $$ \sin{\omega t} + \frac{1}{3}\sin{3\omega t} + \frac{1}{5}\sin{5\omega t} + \ldots $$

As you can see, the sum quickly becomes identical to the square wave, and in actual fact you can prove that in the limit they are the same function. In general we can work out what combination of sinusoids make up any periodic function.

So the fact that the mechanics of resonance are often only worked out using sinusoidal waves doesn't matter, as it's possible to express any complicated force as a combination of sinusoids, then just add up the effect that these components have on the oscillator individually to get the total.

For your example with the bucket of water, to work out the motion of the water, you would need to examine the force on the bucket due to the holes, and see what sinusoidal components there are at each frequency. Working through the analysis shows that if you want the most response from the bucket, you should ride such that you hit the holes at a frequency equal to the natural frequency of the bucket. But you can also get strong responses if you cycle such that you're at e.g 1/2, 1/3 etc of the bucket frequency, because of the distribution of the impact's sinusoidal components.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.