3
$\begingroup$

I am not referring to the experiment being conducted at Lancaster University involving liquid helium and a magnetic field to build a marble sized representation of the early cosmos.

My question is: would it theoretically be possible to actually construct a brane which would exist inside a bulk of our own design? Something observable? A tiny universe which would be born from a baby bang and develop in a similar way to our own universe as we have observed it.

If such a thing were possible:

  • What would the time scale be?
  • Would it be perceived by the observers (us) as accelerated or perhaps slow?
  • Would the universe be lost forever after creation, unable to be observed?

I also understand that at a quantum level, matter actually behaves differently depending if it is being observed or not observed by an entity affecting it's state... even to the point where a temporal change can take place, would this also have an effect on observing a tiny universe?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

If you're asking whether there is any chance we'll be able to do this in the forseeable future then answer is no.

If, however, you're asking whether general relativity allows constructions like this then the answer is yes.

Your question refers to a brane which would exist inside a bulk of our own design, and I don't know how literally you meant this but it would have to refer to a 2+1D universe embedded within ours. That's impossible because there's no way to restrict any physical system to two spatial dimensions. What GR allows is geometries referred to as a bag of gold spacetimes.

I'll use an analogy to explain this, but please remember this is just an analogy so don't take it too literally. Suppose we represent our spacetime as a rubber sheet - you'll no doubt have seen popular science programmes using this analogy, even though in some ways it's a poor one. Draw a circle on the rubber sheet then inflate the sheet within that circle so it bulges out like a ballon. The result would look like the region labeled FRW region in this diagram:

Bag of gold spacetime

(image from this paper)

If we get the geometry correct the the balloon will start expanding like our universe does, but it wouldn't be expanding into anything. All we would see is something that looks like a black hole and the new expanding universe would be hidden on the far side of that black hole. Indeed Lee Smolin has suggested that all black holes have a universe like this hidden on their far side, though I must emphasise that most physicists regard this as fun but unlikely.

But, but, but, but ...

The bag of gold spacetimes are constructed by welding together two solutions to Einstein's equation. Typically a region with the FLRW metric is joined to a region with the Schwarzschild metric. Mathematically this is a perfectly reasonable thing to do and the result is also a solution to Einstein's equation and therefore a possible spacetime geometry. However what this process does not tell us is how we would actually construct such a spacetime starting from flat space. As far as I know no-one has shown it is physically possible (or indeed impossible) to actually construct a new universe in this way.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ might I suggest magnets? But for a problem this tricky, we might have to use lasers as well. $\endgroup$ – Jim Jul 23 '15 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Jimself: just as soon as I can lay my hands on some exotic matter I'm going to attempt to construct my very own bag of gold universe. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jul 23 '15 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ Is a bag of gold universe always marked by a rainbow universe? $\endgroup$ – Jim Jul 23 '15 at 16:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy