1
$\begingroup$

If an object at t=0 begins to free-fall into a black hole from X in Kruskal coordinates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%E2%80%93Szekeres_coordinates), what does its path on the Kruskal-Szekeres diagram look like? Is it a hyperbola, or a straight line, or something else?

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

It looks like this picture on the right from Misner-Thorne-Wheeler:

enter image description here

It's almost a straight line.

But can I add this: I don't like Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates at all. Take a look at the picture on the left. That shows the object's path on the Schwarzschild diagram. Note how it's truncated vertically? The vertical axis is the time axis. In order to cross the event horizon at r=2M, the infalling body allegedly goes to the end of time and back$^*$. The horizontal axis is the spatial axis. Look across from right to left near where it says τ=33.3M. The infalling body is in two places at once, just like the elephant and the event horizon. Also note where the Wikipedia Kruskal-Szekeres article says this: "Note GM is the gravitational constant multiplied by the Schwarzschild mass parameter, and this article is using units where c = 1". That just doesn't square with what Einstein said: "As a simple geometric consideration shows, the curvature of light rays occurs only in spaces where the speed of light is spatially variable". You'll be aware that the coordinate speed of light at the event horizon is zero? So a light clock stops? IMHO Kruskal-Szekeres airbrush over this by effectively putting a stopped observer in front of a stopped light-clock and claiming he still sees it ticking normally.

$*$ Seriously. You can even read about this in the mathspages Formation and Growth of Black Holes: "the infalling object traverses through infinite coordinate time in order to reach the event horizon, and then traverses back through an infinite range of coordinate times until reaching r = 0 (in the interior) in a net coordinate time that is not too different from the elapsed proper time".

$\endgroup$
0
0
$\begingroup$

If we allow Hawking radiation, we can see that this time-journey cannot happen way at the boundary of a (hypothetical) developing Schwarzschild hole: the particle pairs of Hawking radiation are developed outside the event horizon; in this reference frame the particles are still just outside any possible horizon. Hawking radiation can therefore interact with what are still 'real' particles*. The particle is destroyed in finite time. Schrodinger-type feline arguments that the particle indeterminately proceed through both time-frames cannot apply here, because the outcome is already known. (That is, even if quantum jumps past infinite time or infinite energy barriers were allowed). This argument seems to me to be robust and unfalsifiable for Schwarzschild holes. Kerr holes are more complex, but I cannot see any reason that the argument could not be extended. Does anyone know anything to the contrary? asymptopitically *Their time-development may be slowing asymptotically towards zero, but it's still progressing.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.