5
$\begingroup$

I believe to have understood that some physical experiments suggest finite values to divergent series (please correct me if I'm wrong, my understanding of these matters is limited).

I heard, for example, that the "equality" $$ \sum_{n=1}^{ \infty} n = - \frac{1}{12} $$ was suggested by some experiment conducted by physicists.

I was wondering if there are experiments in physics that seem to suggest two or more different values to the same divergent series. If not, why is this the case?

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That identity comes from the definition of the Riemann zeta function by analytic continuation - it's a purely mathematical procedure. I've never heard that it was suggested by a physical experiment. Any chance you can find a reference for that? $\endgroup$ – David Z♦ Jan 10 '12 at 22:21
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Physical experiments don't give the results of mathematical equations, ever. They give the results of some physical process. Equations can either correctly predict the outcome of the physical experiment, or they can fail to do so. $\endgroup$ – Colin K Jan 10 '12 at 22:24
  • $\begingroup$ @David Zaslavsky: Nope, I can't. I was told this was true by one of my mathematics teachers during a lecture he gave. $\endgroup$ – Max Muller Jan 10 '12 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ This particular sum is also discussed here, and on math.SE here. See also Riemann series theorem. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic♦ Jan 11 '12 at 10:55
1
$\begingroup$

No physical experiment ever predicts the result of a mathematical formula. A physical experiment may determine whether a certain model, described in the language of math, applies to a particular physical phenomenon.

That being said, divergent series can come up when working within the mathematical framework of quantum field theory. The values of certain physical quantities, like scattering cross sections, can be expressed in terms of infinite series that diverge unless a mathematical technique called regularization, followed by renormalization, is used to allow the series to have finite sums. The value of the sum may vary depending on a value chosen for a parameter called a coupling constant used in the summation of the series. By comparing to experiments, the value of the coupling constant can be determined.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is it regularization or renormalization? Im quite sure that the subtracting of infinities while dealing with the charge of an electron(Whicg is actually $\infty$) is called renormalization... $\endgroup$ – Manishearth Feb 10 '12 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ It's both regularization and renormalization. I'll edit my entry. $\endgroup$ – kleingordon Feb 10 '12 at 8:48
  • $\begingroup$ Both? Makes sense.. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Manishearth Feb 10 '12 at 9:43
0
$\begingroup$

You might like to read the Wikipedia articles on 1+2+3+4+... and on zeta function regularization including the comments on heat kernel regularization, the evaluation of path integrals in curved spacetimes and the vacuum expectation value of the energy of a particle field in quantum field theory.

The origin seems to have been Leonhard Euler, who did do physics, but seems to have produced this particular assertion playing with mathematics. Srinivasa Ramanujan later produced it too.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.