How can we construct the Pauli matrices starting from $$\sigma_i=\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ c& d \end{bmatrix}$$ by using the conditions $$\sigma^2_i=1,$$$$\left [ \sigma_x,\sigma_y \right ]=2i\sigma_z,$$ and so on?

  • $\begingroup$ Have you attempted this yourself? Notice that all of these conditions produce a set of equations relating the $\{a,b,c,d\}$. Also, not sure if it is given, by $\text{Tr}(\sigma_i) = 0$ as well. $\endgroup$
    – Ultima
    Jul 7, 2015 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ The problem is I don't know how to start from ?, I found the matrix elements of pauli matrix by using inner product relation and I am completely lost in it. It would be great if anyone could give me any hint to start from. $\endgroup$ Jul 7, 2015 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ this might help web.uconn.edu/~ch351vc/pdfs/spin1.pdf same type of problem $\endgroup$
    – user81619
    Jul 7, 2015 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Ultima You can prove that $\mathrm{tr}(\sigma_i)=0$ from the commutation relationships, so you don't need to assume that as well. $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2015 at 12:02

3 Answers 3


Since each $\sigma_i$ is a scalar multiple of a Lie bracket of other finite matrices, each $\sigma_i$ must be traceless. So straight away we know:


and $\sigma_i^2=\mathrm{id}$ then yields $a^2 + b\,c=1$.

The eigenvalues of any matrix of the form in (1) with $a^2 + b\,c=1$ are $\pm\sqrt{a^2+b\,c} = \pm1$. Therefore, for any set of matrices we find fulfilling all the given relationships, we can do a similarity transformation on the whole set and thus (1) diagonalize any member of the set we choose whilst (2) keeping all the required relationships intact. Exercise: Prove that the given relationships (Lie brackets and $\sigma_i^2=\mathrm{id}$) are indeed invariant under any similarity transformation.

Thus, without loss of generalness, we can always choose one of the set to be:


So now work out the Lie bracket of $\sigma_z$ and $\sigma_x = \left(\begin{array}{cc}a_x&b_x\\c_x&-a_x\end{array}\right)$: result must be $2\,i\,\sigma_y$ and so we get:

$$\sigma_y = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\,b_x \\i\,c_x & 0 \\\end{array}\right)\tag{3}$$

But given $\sigma_y^2=1$ we get $b_x\,c_x=1$ whence $a_x=0$ (since $a_x^2 + b_x\,c_x=1$). So our remaining two matrices are of the forms:

$$\sigma_x = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & b_x \\\frac{1}{b_x} & 0 \\\end{array}\right)$$ $$\sigma_y = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\,b_x \\\frac{i}{b_x} & 0\\\end{array}\right)\tag{4}$$

and the remaining commutation relationships then give you the unknown constant $b_x$.

Once you have found $b_x$, we know from our comments above that any set of matrices fulfilling the required commutation relationships and $\sigma_i^2=\mathrm{id}$ is gotten from this particular set (the "standard" Pauli matrices) by a similarity transformation.

  • $\begingroup$ What is meant by lie bracket ? $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2015 at 13:44
  • $\begingroup$ In this case, lie bracket refers to the commutator. $\endgroup$
    – Omry
    Jul 8, 2015 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ @RoshanShrestha I worked out the commutator (Lie bracket) $[\sigma_z,\,\sigma_x]$ for the assumed form of $\sigma_x$ defined by $a_x,\,b_x,\,c_x$ in the answer. Is this "an example"? $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2015 at 13:58
  • $\begingroup$ Can we also use $\sigma_x$ for generality. Can't we find all the components of Pauli matrices without using any one of them as a generality. $\endgroup$ Jul 9, 2015 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ @RoshanShrestha I'm only sticking to convention: it's customary to call $\sigma_z$ the diagonal one. I'm simply saying you can make a similarity transformation on any set of three matrices fulfilling the given relationships so that any one of them is equal to the diagonal one $\mathrm{diag}(1,\,-1)$. You could call this one $\sigma_x$ if you liked and you'd get a valid set. However, this latter set, like any other set that fulfills the given relationship, can still be derived from the standard set by a similarity transformation. Is this what you mean? $\endgroup$ Jul 9, 2015 at 8:15

SECTION A : Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics - The minimum non-zero case $\:j=1/2\:$

The angular momentum in Quantum Mechanics has the following properties :


The components of the dimensionless orbital angular momentum of a particle $\:\mathbf{L}=\mathbf{J}/\hbar =\left(\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{p}\right)/ \hbar $ satisfy the commutation relations \begin{eqnarray} \left[L_1,L_2\right]& =& L_1L_2-L_2L_1 \ =\ i L_3 \tag{A-01}\\ \left[L_2,L_3\right]&=& L_2L_3-L_3L_2 \ =\ i L_1 \tag{A-02}\\ \left[L_3,L_1\right]&=& L_3L_1-L_1L_3 \ =\ i L_2 \tag{A-03} \end{eqnarray} or in one stroke \begin{equation} \mathbf{L}\times \mathbf{L}= i\mathbf{L} \tag{A-04} \end{equation}

by which

a) The allowable eigenvalues of the absolute value operator \begin{equation} L^2\equiv L_1^2+L_2^2+L_3^2 \tag{A-05} \end{equation} are
\begin{equation} j\left(j+1\right)\;, \qquad j=0\:,\:\tfrac{1}{2}\:,\:1\:,\:\tfrac{3}{2}\:,\:2\:,\:\tfrac{5}{2}\:,\:\ldots \tag{A-06} \end{equation} b) The eigenvalue $\ j\left(j+1\right)\ $ has $\ (2j+1)$-multiplicity to which correspond the $\ (2j+1)\ $ possible eigenvalues of the component $L_3$ across an arbitrary axis $x_3$ \begin{equation} m\;, \qquad m = -j\:,\:-j+1\:,\:\cdots \:,\:j-1\:,\:j \tag{A-07} \end{equation} c) A complete set of common eigenfunctions of $L^2$ and $L_3$ is enumerated by the pair $(j,m)$.

(Note : it has been proved that the orbital angular momentum has only integer values of $j$ while the half-integer values are due exclusively to spin. Moreover, spin can take integer values too).

From this begins a whole story to find the matrix representations of $\:L,L_1,L_2,L_3 \:$ for any value of the aforementioned $\:j\:$. These matrices must satisfy the following conditions for any $\:j\:$ :

(a1) they must be square matrices, say $\:n\times n\:$.

(a2) they must be hermitian, since they represent observables. A measurement of any of them gives a value between its real eigenvalues.

(a3) they must be traceless (the trace of a square matrix is the sum of its diagonal elements). This results from the commutation relations (A-01,02,03) and the property that the trace of the product of two square matrices is independent of their order : \begin{equation} C=[A,B]=AB-BA \Longrightarrow TrC=Tr[A,B]=Tr(AB)-Tr(BA)=0 \tag{A-08} \end{equation}
(a4) since for any $\:j\:$ \begin{equation} L_1^2+L_2^2+L_3^2=L^2=j\left(j+1\right)I \tag{A-09} \end{equation} and there is no reason to distinguish or prefer between the components $\:L_1,L_2,L_3 \:$ we must have \begin{equation} L_1^2=L_2^2=L_3^2=\dfrac{1}{3}L^2=\dfrac{j\left(j+1\right)}{3}I \tag{A-10} \end{equation}

SECTION B : The case $\:j=1/2\:$ and the Pauli matrices $\:\boldsymbol{\sigma}=\left(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}\right)\:$

Suppose now that we must find a matrix representation of $\:L,L_1,L_2,L_3 \:$ for the special case $\:j=1/2\:$. Note that this case concerns only spin of a particle, since the orbital angular momentum takes only integer values of $\:j\:$. In our case from (A-10) \begin{equation} L_1^2=L_2^2=L_3^2=\dfrac{1}{4}I \tag{B-01} \end{equation} From this expression we define the equivalent set of matrices $\:\left(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}\right) \:$ by \begin{equation} L_1=\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{1}\;, \quad L_2=\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{2}\;, \quad L_3=\dfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{3} \tag{B-02} \end{equation} and the problem is to find 3 matrices $\:\left(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}\right) \:$ with properties

\begin{equation} \sigma_{k}=\sigma_{k}^{\boldsymbol{*}}\;, \quad k=1,2,3 \qquad \text{(hermitian)} \tag{B-03a} \end{equation} \begin{equation} \sigma_{k}^{2}=I\;, \quad k=1,2,3 \qquad \text{(idempotent)} \tag{B-03b} \end{equation} \begin{equation} Tr\left(\sigma_{k}\right)=0\;, \quad k=1,2,3 \qquad \text{(traceless)} \tag{B-03c} \end{equation} \begin{align} & \left[\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}\right]= \sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}- \sigma_{2}\sigma_{1}=2i\sigma_{3} \tag{B-03d.1}\\ & \left[\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}\right]=\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}- \sigma_{3}\sigma_{2}=2i\sigma_{1} \tag{B-03d.2}\\ & \left[\sigma_{3},\sigma_{1}\right]=\sigma_{3}\sigma_{1}- \sigma_{1}\sigma_{3}=2i\sigma_{2} \tag{B-03d.3} \end{align}

We begin with matrices of the minimum dimensions. Matrices $\:1\times 1\:$, that is scalars, can't obey the commutation relations. So we proceed with matrices $\:2\times 2\:$. Note that if it's impossible to find matrices $\:2\times 2\:$ that satisfy above properties we proceed to $\:3\times 3\:$ matrices and so on.

So, let a $\:2\times 2\:$ matrix $\:W\:$ that satisfies at first properties (B-03a), (B-03c) that is hermitian and traceless. It's not difficult to see that the general form of such a matrix is

\begin{equation} W= \begin{bmatrix} &w_3&w_1-iw_2&\\ &w_1+iw_2&-w_3& \end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{H} \tag{B-04} \end{equation} where $w_1,w_2,w_3$ are real parameters and $\mathbb{H}$ the linear space of hermitian traceless $2\times2$ matrices. So, there exists a bijection (one-to-one and onto correspondence) between $\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$.

\begin{equation} \mathbf{w}=(w_1,w_2,w_3)\in \mathbb{R}^3\;\longleftrightarrow \; W= \begin{bmatrix} &w_3&w_1-iw_2&\\ &w_1+iw_2&-w_3& \end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{H} \tag{B-05} \end{equation}

Since in $\mathbb{R}^3$ any set of 3 linearly independent vectors $\:\mathbf{a}_{1},\mathbf{a}_{2},\mathbf{a}_{3}\:$ constitute a basis, then the following correspondent set of the 3 hermitian traceless $2\times2$ matrices is a basis for the space $\mathbb{H}$ :

\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{a}_1 &=&(a_{11},a_{21},a_{31}) \longleftrightarrow A_1= \begin{bmatrix} a_{31}&a_{11}-ia_{21}\\ a_{11}+ia_{21}&-a_{31} \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-06a}\\ \mathbf{a}_2 &=&(a_{12},a_{22},a_{32}) \longleftrightarrow A_2= \begin{bmatrix} a_{32}&a_{12}-ia_{22}\\ a_{12}+ia_{22}&-a_{32} \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-06b}\\ \mathbf{a}_3 &=&(a_{13},a_{23},a_{33}) \longleftrightarrow A_3= \begin{bmatrix} \ a_{33}&a_{13}-ia_{23}\\ a_{13}+ia_{23}&-a_{33} \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-06c} \end{eqnarray}

Now, for the general hermitian traceless $2\times2$ matrix $\:W\:$ of equation (B-04) to obey property (B-03b) we must have \begin{equation} W^{2}=I \Longrightarrow \begin{bmatrix} &w_1^2+w_2^2+w_3^2&0&\\ &0&w_1^2+w_2^2+w_3^2& \end{bmatrix} =I \Longrightarrow \Vert\mathbf{w} \Vert^{2}=1 \tag{B-07} \end{equation}
which means that the set of $2\times2$ hermitian traceless idempotent matrices, a subset of $\mathbb{H}$, is in one-to-one and onto correspondence with the surface of the unit sphere of $\mathbb{R}^3$.

So, if the 3 linear independent vectors $\:\mathbf{a}_{1},\mathbf{a}_{2},\mathbf{a}_{3}\:$ are of unit norm $\:\Vert\mathbf{a}_{1} \Vert=\Vert\mathbf{a}_{2}\Vert=\Vert\mathbf{a}_{3}\Vert=1\:$, then the correspondent matrices $\:A_{1},A_{2},A_{3}\:$ of (B-06) have all the properties (B-03a,b,c ).

It remains now to find the necessary properties that the set of 3 matrices $\:A_{1},A_{2},A_{3}\:$ must have in order to satisfy the commutation relations (B-03d). We'll see in the following that these commutation relations impose orthogonality relations between the 3 linear independent unit vectors $\:\mathbf{a}_{1},\mathbf{a}_{2},\mathbf{a}_{3}\:$ and later on how the above analysis gives the standard form of the Pauli matrices.

Now, let another matrix $V\in \mathbb{H}$ generated by a vector $\mathbf{v}$
\begin{equation} \mathbf{v}=(v_1,v_2,v_3)\in \mathbb{R}^3\;\longleftrightarrow \; V= \begin{bmatrix} &v_3&v_1-iv_2&\\ &v_1+iv_2&-v_3& \end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{H} \tag{B-08} \end{equation} and $\:W \in \mathbb{H}\:$ the matrix of (B-05) generated by the vector $\mathbf{w}$. The vectors $\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v}$ have not special properties, like unit norm or normal to each other. Then it's easy to see that \begin{eqnarray} WV &=& \begin{bmatrix} &w_3&w_1-iw_2&\\ &w_1+iw_2&-w_3& \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} &v_3&v_1-iv_2&\\ &v_1+iv_2&-v_3& \end{bmatrix} \nonumber\\ &=& \begin{bmatrix} (\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})+i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3&\ &i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1+(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2\\ i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1-(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2&\ &(\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})-i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-09} \end{eqnarray} or \begin{equation} WV =(\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})I+i\begin{bmatrix} (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3&(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1-i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2\\ (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1+i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2&-(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-10} \end{equation} where $(\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})$ is the inner (scalar) product of vectors $\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v}$ \begin{equation} \mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v}=w_1v_1+w_2v_2+w_3v_3 \tag{B-11} \end{equation} and $(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_\jmath$ are the components of the outer (vector) product between vectors $\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v}$ \begin{eqnarray} (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1&=& w_2v_3-w_3v_2 \nonumber\\ (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2&=& w_3v_1-w_1v_3 \nonumber\\ (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3&=& w_1v_2-w_2v_1 \tag{B-12} \end{eqnarray} Interchanging $W \leftrightarrow V$ and $\mathbf{w}\leftrightarrow \mathbf{v}$ in equation (B-10) \begin{equation} VW =(\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})I-i\begin{bmatrix} (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3&(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1-i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2\\ (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1+i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2&-(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-13} \end{equation} Subtracting from (B-10) we have for the commutator $[W,V]$

\begin{equation} [W,V]=WV-VW =2i\begin{bmatrix} (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3&(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1-i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2\\ (\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_1+i(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_2&-(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})_3 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-14} \end{equation}

So, if the vectors $\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v}\in \mathbb{R}^3$ generate the hermitian traceless $2 \times 2$ matrices $W,V \in \mathbb{H}$ respectively, then the outer product $\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v}$ generates $[W,V]/{2i}$. \begin{equation} \begin{bmatrix} &\mathbf{w}& \longleftrightarrow & W&\\ &\mathbf{v}& \longleftrightarrow & V& \end{bmatrix} \Longrightarrow \begin{bmatrix} &(\mathbf{w}\times \mathbf{v})& \longleftrightarrow & [WV-VW]/{2i}& \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-15} \end{equation}

Also, adding equations(B-10) ,(B-13) we have for the anti-commutator $\left\{W,V\right\}$ \begin{equation} \left\{W,V\right\}=WV+VW =2(\mathbf{w}\circ \mathbf{v})I \\ \tag{B-16} \end{equation}

Equation (B-14) yields the final solution to our problem :

Any set of 3 matrices $\:A_{1},A_{2},A_ {3}\:$ generated as in equations (B-06) from an orthonormal right-handed basis $\:\left(\mathbf{a}_{1},\mathbf{a}_{2},\mathbf{a}_{3}\right)\:$ satisfies all conditions (B-03) and so it can be considered as a representation of the components of dimensionless (spin) angular momentum for $\:j=1/2\:$ in the sense of equations (B-02): \begin{equation} L_1=\dfrac{1}{2}A_{1}\;, \quad L_2=\dfrac{1}{2}A_{2}\;, \quad L_3=\dfrac{1}{2}A_{3} \tag{B-17} \end{equation}

If as orthonormal right-handed basis $\:\left(\mathbf{a}_{1},\mathbf{a}_{2},\mathbf{a}_{3}\right)\:$ we choose the usual basis \begin{equation} \mathbf{e}_{1}=\left(1,0,0\right),\quad \mathbf{e}_{2}=\left(0,1,0\right),\quad \mathbf{e}_{3}=\left(0,0,1\right) \tag{B-18} \end{equation} respectively then we have in place of the matrices $\:A_{1},A_{2},A_ {3}\:$ the well-known Pauli Matrices $\:\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2},\sigma_ {3}\:$ respectively :

\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{e}_1 &=&(1,0,0)\qquad \longleftrightarrow \qquad \sigma_1= \begin{bmatrix} &0&1&\\ &1&0& \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-19a}\\ \mathbf{e}_2 &=&(0,1,0)\qquad \longleftrightarrow \qquad \sigma_2= \begin{bmatrix} &0&-i\\ &i&0 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-19b}\\ \mathbf{e}_3 &=&(0,0,1)\qquad \longleftrightarrow \qquad \sigma_3= \begin{bmatrix} &1&0\\ &0&-1 \end{bmatrix} \tag{B-19c} \end{eqnarray}

  • $\begingroup$ Whoa thats a very thorough answer. Looks like something from a textbook. $\endgroup$
    – Horus
    Jul 8, 2015 at 15:04

There are very good answers here already, however, for heuristic purposes, I will derive the Pauli matrices just from the 3 postulates presented, without any further assumptions, using only matrix multiplication and solving a few equations.

The 3 postulates presented by you can be written as:

$(1)$ $\sigma_i$ are $2 \times 2$ matrices;

$(2)$ $\sigma^2_i=I$;

$(3)$ $\left [ \sigma_i,\sigma_j \right ]=2i\sigma_k,$, where $i≠j≠k$ are indexes;

The general form of a $2 \times 2$ matrix is $$\sigma_i=\begin{bmatrix} a_i & b_i\\ c_i & d_i \end{bmatrix} \tag{4}$$

Applying $(3)$

$$\begin{bmatrix} a_i & b_i\\ c_i & d_i \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a_j & b_j\\ c_j & d_j \end{bmatrix} -\begin{bmatrix} a_j & b_j\\ c_j & d_j \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a_i & b_i\\ c_i & d_i \end{bmatrix} = 2i\begin{bmatrix} a_k & b_k\\ c_k & d_k \end{bmatrix} $$

Doing the math on the left-hand side and equating the terms occupying the same position at the right-hand side, we get a set of 4 equations, one of which is $d_k=-a_k$. Since, $k$ is a free index any of the particular indexes set there (${1,2,3};{x,y,z}$) must give the same result, meaning that the general form of the matrices is $$\sigma_i=\begin{bmatrix} a_i & b_i\\ c_i & -a_i \end{bmatrix} \tag{4'}$$ $(4')$ indicates that any $2 \times 2$ matrices satisfying condition $(3)$ must be traceless.

Squaring $(4')$ and applying condition $(2)$, we get $$\begin{bmatrix} a_i^2+b_ic_i & 0\\ 0 & a_i^2+b_ic_i \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$$ or $$a_i^2+b_ic_i=1 \tag{5}$$

If one imagines $a,b$ and $c$ as points in a 3D space, it is easy to check that once a particular choice for them is made, such a choice creates a basis vector into that particular direction, thus, every other choices that has a component in that direction, can be written as a linear combination of the former, consequently, individual choices do not reduce generality.

With this in mind, the solutions to $(5)$ are:

a) $a=±1$ (basis for all solutions that $a$ do not vanishes)

This choice demands every possible value for $b$ and $c$ to be in the $(a,b)$ or in the $(a,c)$ planes, meaning $b=0,\,c=\lambda_1$ or $b=\lambda_2,\,c=0$ with $\lambda$ any real or complex scalar. The 2 choices above give us 2 different matrices. However, it is easy to show (you can try by applying $(3)$ into those matrices) that any choice for $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ not simultaneously $0$ won't satisfy $(3)$, hence, for $a=±1$ there is only one possible solution, which is

$$\sigma_3=\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \tag{6}$$ The solutions $a=-1$ are not needed as it will be a scalar multiple of $(6)$.

b) $a=0$ (solutions that vanishes the right-hand side of $(5)$’s sum)

$$bc=1 \tag{7}$$

This places the solutions into the $(b,c)$ plane. Considering that for the sake of generality $a$ and $b$ could be complex numbers, all possible points in the $(b,c)$ plane can just be written as linear combinations of a pure real and a pure imaginary basis vectors. The simplest real basis vector in the $(b,c)$ plane satisfying $(7)$ is $b=1,\,c=1$, that gives us

$$\sigma_1=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \tag{8}$$

The pure imaginary basis vector to $(7)$ is $b=-i,\,c=i$ (or the scalar multiple of this $b=i,\,c=-i$, which is obviously the same choice).

$$\sigma_2=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{bmatrix} \tag{9}$$

The 3 matrices $(6),(8)$ and $(9)$ are the Pauli matrices and they spans the set of all matrices that satisfy the proposed postulates. They form the full set of basis vector for the $2 \times 2$ matrix representation $\sigma_i$s.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.