3
$\begingroup$

I am looking for an introductory textbook on QFT in curved space-time via the path integral method. I want to understand the following:

  • How to build a generic perturbative QFT in curved space-time
  • Are there some specific difficulties with normalization
  • How to derive observables / particle states in curved space-time
  • The Unruh effect
  • The Hawking radiation

I would appreciate if the author would use path integrals instead of the canonical formalism when possible. The reason for this is purely aesthetic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There's a comprehensive book on path integrals by Kleinert, which discusses quantization on curved manifolds (chapter 10 of 'Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics [etc.]'). Wald's GR textbook also has a chapter on QFT in curved spacetime, and Carroll's textbook has a clear explanation of the Unruh effect. $\endgroup$ – TotallyRhombus Jun 29 '15 at 16:32
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/110763/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 29 '15 at 17:04
3
$\begingroup$

I would suggest one of the (standard) books (though somehow old) on QFT in curved spacetime,

  • Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Birrel & Davies) Relates to path integral formalism, and covers a lot of topics in QFT on curved spacetime
  • Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime (Parker & Toms) Uses DeWitt notation, a lot based on effective action derived from some path integral, very good book treating also black holes
  • [Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics (R. Wald)] Also standard text book, but I feel it might be only the third choice for you

If you want to pursue afterwards you can have a look at DeWitt's work (however you have to get used to his style, afterwards its great)

  • Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (DeWitt)

Summarizing I would say, for an answer to the first three issues Parker & Toms or DeWitt would be the best choice, however for a general introduction Birrel & Davies is quite nice and sufficient.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.