I'm trying to understand the relationship between the exponentials in the field expansion and the energy of the of the particle being positive or negative.

  • Is it necessary or is it a convention that the exponential $e^{ip^{\mu}x_{\mu}}$ ($e^{-ip^{\mu}x_{\mu}}$) must be by the side of the creation (annihilation) operator $a_{\vec{p}}^{\dagger}$ ($a_{\vec{p}}$)?

  • How can I see that $a_{\vec{p}}^{\dagger}$ creates a positive energy particle in Klein-Gordon? And in Dirac's equation?

    In Dirac's case, when you plug $u\left(p\right)e^{-ip^{\mu}x_{\mu}}$ in $h_{D}=-i\partial_{0}$, where $h_{D}=-i\vec{\alpha}\cdot\vec{\nabla}+m\beta$ is Dirac's Hamiltonian in QM, you find that it is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue $+E_{\vec{p}}$. From this I would think that this exponential tells me that, if the creation operator is beside it, it creates a positive-energy particle (this is taken from Peskin&Schroeder Section 3.5)(the positive-frequency exponential has a negative eigenvalue). However, in pg. 55 of the same section, P&S say "if we want $\bar{\psi}_{a}\left|0\right>$ to be made up of only positive-energy components, then $a_{\vec{p}}^{\dagger}u\left(p\right)e^{ip^{\mu}x_{\mu}}$ must create the particle state. This contradicts what he said before (or, at least, it seems to me it does)!

    In Klein-Gordon's case, any exponential has eigenvalue $E_{\vec{p}}^{2}$ because it is a second-order differential equation, so how do I associate exponential with positive or negative energies?

Hope my question is understandable.



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.