2
$\begingroup$

What is the difference between the momentum $p$ in $e^{i\mathbf{p}\cdot{\mathbf{x}}}$ in the Fourier transform of a scalar field and the corresponding conjugate momenta $\pi(x)$ of the scalar field?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The $p$ in the Fourier transform of the (free real scalar) field $$ \phi(x) = \int \left(a(\vec p)\exp(-\mathrm{i}px) + a^\dagger(\vec p)\exp(\mathrm{i}px)\right)\frac{\mathrm{d}^3p}{2p^0} $$ is a number, it is essentially a change in coordinates on $\mathbb{R}^n$ like every Fourier transform.

The canonically conjugate momentum $\pi(x) := \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}$ is another field, together with $\phi(x)$ it forms a set of coordinates for the classical (field) phase space (which is infinite-dimensional for fields).

In particular, the $p$ from the Fourier transform does not become an operator in the course of canonical quantization, it is different from the momentum operator $$ P^\mu = \int p^\mu a^\dagger(\vec p)a(p) \mathrm{\vec d}^3 p$$ which, also, is not the operator associated to the canonically conjugate momentum.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your answer, but P in the exponential gives the value of momentum P when we insert it inside the Klein-Gordon equation, we get a mass shell condition $m^{2}+P^{2}=E^{2}$ so it has a physical meaning not just a coordinate change $\endgroup$ – Quantum Fields Jun 15 '15 at 1:26
  • $\begingroup$ @QuantumFields: That's because we Fourier transform only the spatial part $\vec x$ of $x = (x^0,\vec x)$, and get $p^0 = E_p$ precisely from the constraint $p^2 = -m^2$. Note the weird-looking integration measure, which is discussed e.g. in this post. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jun 15 '15 at 15:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.