0
$\begingroup$

I have started to work through Herbert Goldstein's, Charles Poole's and John Safko's Classical mechanics, and I am having a bit of trouble with one of the problems (chapter 1 problem 16). The problem is as follows:

A particle moves in a plane under the influence of a force, acting toward a center of force, whose magnitude is

$$F=\frac1{r^2}\left(1-\frac{\dot{r}^2-2\ddot{r}r}{c^2}\right)$$

where $r$ is the distance of the particle to the center of force. Find the generalized potential that will result in such a force, and from that the Lagrangian for the motion in a plane.

I was looking through the solution on chegg for this problem, and I can't seem to understand one step they took. I understand how to obtain the lagrangian and equations of motion once I have the generalized potential, but I can't figure out how they got the potential. This is the way that they solve for it:

enter image description here

I understand how they obtained the first term in Lagrange's equation (i.e. $-\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}\left(\frac{1}{r}+\frac{\dot{r}^2}{c^2r}\right)$), but I can't figure out how they obtained the second term ($\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\dot{r}}}\left(\frac{1}{r}+\frac{\dot{r}^2}{c^2r}\right)$). When I try to extract $\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\dot{r}}}$ from $\frac{2\ddot{r}}{c^2r^2}-\frac{2\dot{r}^2}{c^2r^2}$, I can't get what they are getting. Does anyone know how they solved for the generalized potential here, or know a better way to do so? I know from what I have done in electromagnetism that the potential of a field can be found through a line integral of the force from $-\infty$ to r, but when I approach the problem that way, I get a natural log term at the end. Any help with how to approach this problem would be very appreciated!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Have you tried differentiating their solution to see how via reverse/backwards engineering it? $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jun 12 '15 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I tried that and for the second term I got $\frac{2\ddot{r}}{c^2r^2}-\frac{4\dot{r}^2c^2r}{(c^2r^2)^2}$. It's very close, and I'm sure I'm just making a stupid mistake, but I can't seem to figure out what it is. $\endgroup$ – Matt Ntiros Jun 12 '15 at 13:36
1
$\begingroup$

There is a small misprint in the third line (the 3rd term).

If you try to differentiate the second part, you will get exactly part of the force: $\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot{r}}\left(\frac{1}{r}+\frac{\dot{r}^2}{c^2 r}\right)=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{2\dot{r}^2}{c^2 r}\right)=\frac{2 \ddot{r}}{c^2 r}-\frac{2 \dot{r}^2}{c^2r^2}$

And also your last equation should be like this $F=-\frac{\partial U}{\partial r}+\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial U}{\partial \dot{r}}$. Overall this kind of task should be just an exercise where you try to find a potential according to the type of force function.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! I can't believe I missed that typo. I assume you mean $\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{2\dot{r}}{c^2r}\right)$ right? $\endgroup$ – Matt Ntiros Jun 12 '15 at 15:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.