I've recently become interested in the primary colours; red, green and blue.

In my capacity as a computer programmer I'm well aware of how these colours are used practically, and of how varying combinations of the three can produce any colour visible to the human eye.

However, it occurs to me that these are essentially three evenly spaced frequencies on the visible spectrum. I don't know of any scientific reason why these colours are used to combine light, or if they are distinct in any way.

  • does anything measurable distinguish primary colours from other colours?
  • could the same method be used to produce any colour from, for instance, yellow, cyan/teal and magenta light?
  • is it possible to produce any colour on the visible spectrum by combining just two other colours?
  • $\begingroup$ The wavelength/frequency of light of different colours are different. $\endgroup$
    – Gonenc
    Jun 6, 2015 at 9:26
  • $\begingroup$ This much I had gathered, the question is about what singles out the primary colours. $\endgroup$
    – AJFaraday
    Jun 6, 2015 at 9:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think from the position of physics they are all the same. It's basically a biological distinction. See also Is it only red, green and blue that can make up any color through additive mixture? $\endgroup$
    – Gonenc
    Jun 6, 2015 at 9:31
  • $\begingroup$ The human colour space is three-dimensional (but some animals have 4,5 or even 20 dimensional colour spaces). Any three linearly independent colours can serve as basis, red-blue-green is just a rather convenient one with near maximum independence. $\endgroup$
    – Walter
    Jun 6, 2015 at 10:41
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/16903/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Jun 6, 2015 at 11:25

1 Answer 1


You need to keep well in mind that the sensation of color is a semantic meaning that the human mind's processing attaches to the spectral content of light.

The mixing of "primary colors" was experimentally found (first by artists for red, yellow and blue with natural pigments, then later for, usually, red, green and blue by photography and color projection technologists) to reproduce the sensation that humans attach to color. Isaac Newton was one of the early experimenters who formalized the red, yellow, blue pigment standard. James Clerk Maxwell used red, yellow, blue filters in his early experiments with color photography.

Physically we can give the glib explanation that the wavelengths need to roughly match the peak sensitivity wavelengths and this is why red, green and blue scheme match the peak sensitivity wavelengths of the three kinds of cone receptors used to sense the spectral content of light. These sensitivity curves are shown below, taken from the Wikipedia "Spectral Sensitivity" page. As you can also see, each cones is not sensitive to one wavelength alone, so different spectral combinations of light can give rise to the same relative response of the three different kinds of cone cells. Moreover, the sensitivity curves differ from person to person, so one non-color-blind person can detect differences between spectral content that cannot be detected by another non-color-blind person and contrariwise. In particular, there are two distinct gene types encoding green reception, so there are two different green center frequencies. Which gene type you are sets whether you will perceive "aquas" as greenish blues of bluish green.

Human cone spectral sensitivity

Many sets of different color primaries have been tried and all will work fairly well (another often used set is yellow, magenta and cyan). But because each cone is sensitive to a range of wavelengths as noted above, none can reproduce the full range of color sensation that any given human can perceive.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.