2
$\begingroup$

I am following some notes on supersymmetry by Matteo Bertolini and I need some clarification.

Chapter five deals with sypersymmetric Lagrangians and the superpotential is introduced. It is stated that the interaction terms of chiral superfields are given by $$\mathcal{L}_{int}=\int{}d^2\theta\,W(\Phi)+h.c.\tag{5.15}$$ where $W$ is the superpotential and $\Phi$ is a chiral superfield. $$\Phi=\phi+\sqrt{2}\theta\psi+i\theta\sigma^{\mu}\bar{\theta}\partial_{\mu}\phi-\theta\theta{}F-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\theta\theta\partial_{\mu}\psi\sigma^{\mu}\bar{\theta}-\frac{1}{4}\theta\theta\bar{\theta}\bar{\theta}\partial^2\phi\tag{4.54}$$ in page 81, it is said that this integral is easy if we notice that we can expand the superpotential $$W(\Phi)=W(\phi)+\sqrt{2}\frac{\partial{}W}{\partial\phi}\theta\psi-\theta\theta\left(\frac{\partial{}W}{\partial\phi}F+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2{}W}{\partial\phi\partial\phi}\psi\psi\right)\tag{5.19}$$ so $$\mathcal{L}_{int}=-\frac{\partial{}W}{\partial\phi}F-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2{}W}{\partial\phi\partial\phi}\psi\psi+h.c.\tag{5.20}$$ all this looks very good from afar. Nonetheless, let's take the specific case $$W=M\Phi^2$$ where $M$ is some mass constant and try to perform $$\frac{\partial{}W}{\partial\phi}=2M\Phi\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\phi}=2M\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}\left(\phi+\sqrt{2}\theta\psi+i\theta\sigma^{\mu}\bar{\theta}\partial_{\mu}\phi-\theta\theta{}F-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\theta\theta\partial_{\mu}\psi\sigma^{\mu}\bar{\theta}-\frac{1}{4}\theta\theta\bar{\theta}\bar{\theta}\partial^2\phi\right)$$ here goes my question, when taking the partial derivative of either $\Psi$ or $W$ respect to $\phi$, which are the other variables? Do I need to consider $\Psi(\phi,\psi,F)$? what do I do then with $\partial_{\mu}\phi$ and $\partial^2\phi$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The Taylor expansion of the superpotential around $\Phi=\phi$ is $$ W(\Phi)=W(\phi) + \left.\frac{\partial W}{\partial \Phi}\right|_{\Phi=\phi}(\Phi - \phi) + \frac12 \left.\frac{\partial^2 W}{\partial \Phi^2}\right|_{\Phi=\phi}(\Phi - \phi)^2 + \cdots $$ If you write a chiral field as a function of the co-ordinates $y$ and $\theta$, $$ \Phi(y, \theta) = \phi(y) + \sqrt{2}\theta\psi(y)- \theta\theta F(y) $$ You find that, $$ W(\Phi) = W(\phi) + \left.\frac{\partial W}{\partial \Phi}\right|_{\Phi=\phi} (\sqrt{2}\theta\psi(y) - \theta\theta F(y)) + \left.\frac{\partial^2 W}{\partial \Phi^2}\right|_{\Phi=\phi} \theta\theta\psi(y)\psi(y) $$ In other words, all the derivatives are wrt the superfield $\Phi$ and not the scalar component $\phi$. Note that the Taylor expansion terminates because of the Grassman co-ordinates.

For what it's worth, $\phi$ and $\partial^\mu \phi$ are independent - this is the question of whether speed and position are independent co-ordinates in classical mechanics.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ another question. Then in $\mathcal{L}_{int}$ after going from $y$ coordinates to $x$ coordinates you get explicit dependence on grassman variables. Is this right? I mean, this is supposed to be a Lagrangian that goes in a spacetime integral, so I won't be able to get rid of the Grassmann variables in the action. Shouldn't the action not contain any variables? $\endgroup$ – Yossarian Jun 2 '15 at 15:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.