2
$\begingroup$

OK, I'm not a physics student, but I played one for 2 semesters 35 years ago... now I'm a competitive shooter working a theory about why small changes in atmospheric conditions cause our hyper-tuned competition guns to go out of tune. I've done a lot of research into the normal 'large-scale' parameters of internal ballistics, but I have a couple thousand targets of empirical data on some small scale tuning that I haven't been able to find the science to back it up.

Scenario: my competition rifle has a threaded steel 'tuner' ring on the muzzle end marked to record changes in .001" increments. Over several years of testing by only adjusting the tuner, I've come up with a formula that works out to about .0012" of tuner movement per degree of atmospheric temperature change to 'keep the gun in tune'. This number has worked across a number of barrels for several shooters and seems to correspond with changing the timing of a reflected acoustic shock wave in the barrel steel (see NASA Fellow Chris Long's Shock Wave Theory explanation on his site http://www.the-long-family.com). I use temperature with a humidity correction factor, other shooters have had similar results using air density altitude meters. The missing piece is the math accounting for the atmospheric changes.

According to Chris's theory, a bullet has a critical time when it has just started to move. The shock wave opens (or conversely chokes) the bullet, changing the pressure and ultimately the timing of the bullet exit from the muzzle. This initial movement would be prone to resistance by barrel friction and by back pressure from the column of air ahead of it in the barrel. We keep the internal pressure and friction constant by shooting the same powder charge and seating depth. Using a tuner, I can effectively change the barrel 'length' to control timing on the shock wave, but am left with needing an equation for resistance to the bullet movement (piston) by air pressure inside the barrel (cylinder open on one end, .238" in diameter, 20" long) versus the atmospheric pressure or air density outside the barrel.

4000 psi would be a typical number required to start the bullet moving, with 'in-tune' values somewhere in the range of 4000 to 11000 psi versus a peak pressure of about 58000 psi once the bullet is underway. Shooters without tuners adjust the seating depth and neck tension of their cartridges to find the 'sweet spot'. An equation that accounts for a resistance to movement in that back pressure range would provide some unity to this whole problem.

Rod

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Wow... I wasn't aware just how much physics precision shooters like to use for their craft! Very cool! The bullet is basically a perfect piston which has to remove the entire air column from the barrel, isn't it? In that sense the effective mass of the bullet seems to be the mass of the bullet itself plus some fraction of the mass of the air column. I would have expected the change of the mass of the air column due to temperature and humidity to be already absorbed in the basic correction formula? $\endgroup$ – CuriousOne May 27 '15 at 18:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You say We keep the internal pressure and friction constant by shooting the same powder charge and seating depth. just sort me out on this. You seem to have accounted and allowed for other variables, how do you know that each cartridge gives a consistent effect? It would seem to me to be a big variable, the one that you have least control over, re the composition of the propellent. In other words, how do shooters / manufactures test that each cartridge produces the same explosive charge. Purely from curiosity and lack of experience. $\endgroup$ – user81619 May 27 '15 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ When you "tune" - it is the exit velocity of the bullet, or the "drop" at a certain distance, that you tune to? I suspect that the drag encountered in flight (which is a function of air density, and thus temperature/humidity/barometric pressure) is significant. Can you clarify? $\endgroup$ – Floris May 27 '15 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ Tuning is adjusting any number of factors to keep shot dispersion near 0". Most models relate to timing the bullet's exit from the muzzle. Changing powder type (faster/slower burn rates), adjusting charge amount (more/less pressure), seating depth of the bullet in the case (affects burn rate and pressure required to initiate movement), and case sizing for more/less tension on the bullet (affects pressure curve timing). Shooters often correlate these to small atmospheric changes as in "If the temp goes up, back off by .2 gns of powder. Q is how does 5 degrees make a difference at all? $\endgroup$ – CubCouper Jun 3 '15 at 15:08
1
$\begingroup$

OK - this turned out to be a really interesting topic. I am not an expert... until today I didn't even know that rifles were tuned. But I am a physicist, and I like to get to the bottom of things. In this case, I won't claim I am there - but I have some insights to share.

The most informative site I found is probably the description of rifle tuning on Al Varmint's website. In summary, when you fire a rifle the gun recoils, and this recoil results in a number of transverse vibrations being set up along the barrel of the gun. As far as I can tell, there will be multiple modes of vibration - the higher modes having higher frequencies, obviously. The key to the accuracy of the gun is the exact angle that the muzzle of the gun is pointing when the bullet leaves. And since the vibration of the muzzle is relatively repeatable, this means you need to get the time of flight of the bullet down the length of the gun down to the same value every time - or adjust the frequency of vibration of the barrel. It appears to me that the different methods of tuning can do either of these things.

First - a quick visual of the vibration (from the above website):

First mode of vibration:

enter image description here

And second mode of vibration:

enter image description here

For the rifle modeled, the first mode has a frequency around 80 Hz, and the second, around 439 Hz - much more than 3x higher because the barrel is rigidly held at one end, and tapers along the length.

From the above link:

ADDING A TUNER.... Adding a tuner to the muzzle of a rifle barrel does the following:
1. The additional mass reduces the amplitude of the vibrations.
2. Decreases the natural frequencies by decreasing the lower Mode's frequencies more than the higher Modes.
3. Increases the barrel's vertical end sag due to the extra weight. This would tend to make the vertical plane the preferred plane of vibration.
4. Moves the Mode 2 node closer to the muzzle.

Summarizing what then follows, the timing of the bullet exiting the barrel becomes the critical thing; you actually want to get the time when the first modes all reinforce each other, and catch the muzzle at a "stationary point" - that is, if there are small variations in the time of exit of the bullet, you don't want this to affect the direction in which the muzzle is pointing. This is probably best achieved by having the first harmonics all "point the same way".

The typical time for the bullet to travel the length of the barrel is about 1 ms; at a frequency of 100 Hz, the barrel makes the first upswing at around 2.5 ms. These numbers are not inconsistent. If the bullet is a little bit faster, you would like the muzzle to point a little less far up; and when it is slower, you want it to point a little more up. Thus, you "tune" your barrel when the muzzle is reaching the end of its upswing when a bullet of average velocity exits.

That is part one - why does tuning a rifle work at all.

Now on to part two - what is the role of temperature? Well, first I read this article about the temperature rise of rifle barrels during Olympic shooting. It concluded that at a rate of two shots per minute, the barrel temperature increased about 4 degrees, and that this did not affect accuracy. Of course, this is for a well tuned gun... It did state the coefficient of thermal expansion was about $1.2\cdot 10^{-5} / K$; furthermore, the Young's modulus of steel drops with temperature. Taken together, these effects will lower the frequency of the vibration with temperature. If you need the frequency to remain roughly constant, you will have to "shorten" the barrel a little bit as the temperature goes up - in other words, screw the tuner IN, towards the stock, with temperature.

It is hard to estimate how much the tuner needs to move, as it depends on the relative mass of the tuner and the barrel. In fact the change in length of the barrel is small: for a 60 cm (22") barrel, length changes (grows) by about 7 µm or 0.0003" for every degree C of temperature change. Since the barrel also gets wider, this expansion would actually increase the resonant frequency. However, and more importantly, the Young's modulus of steel changes by about 1% for every 35 °C, or 0.03% per degree. This means that the resonant frequency will shift down by 0.015% per degree - which might be significant.

The final piece of the puzzle is the time it takes the bullet to exit the barrel - because it's the relative timing of that with the vibration of the barrel that determines whether the gun is well tuned.

Now the question is how much the density of the air affects that time. The bullet quickly reaches supersonic velocity in the barrel - and when it does so, the air in front is compressed and a shock wave is formed. The speed of sound in air changes with temperature, so the speed of the shock wave (and thus the pressure) will depend on the initial temperature. In hotter air, pressure will be lower (speed of shock wave is higher). It is a bit late at night to do the detailed calculation... let me know if any of the above makes sense, and I might be encouraged to expand the analysis further.

Some potentially interesting things to read:

http://www.oglethorpe.edu/faculty/~j_cramer/documents/chapter1_000.doc

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_ballistics

http://benchrest.com/archive/index.php/t-48578.html

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thus, you "tune" your barrel when the muzzle is reaching the end of its upswing - this is not the end of the upswing, but almost the end, right? $\endgroup$ – André Chalella May 28 '15 at 3:39
  • $\begingroup$ @AndréNeves right - the small difference ("not quite the end of the upswing") should permit a self correction for variations in bullet velocity. $\endgroup$ – Floris May 28 '15 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ I've studied those resources, but none account for the atmospheric conditions. The rifle barrel will go from ambient to 110-120F in a 2 minute string of 10 shots and we are careful to not let a round 'cook' in a warm barrel. But the 'tune' required for small groups better correlates to atmospheric changes, rather than barrel temp changes. This lead me to the question the open ended piston against atmospheric air density as a possibility. $\endgroup$ – CubCouper Jun 3 '15 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ @CubCouper let me take another shot at it then... Pun intended. May be a day before I get to it. $\endgroup$ – Floris Jun 3 '15 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ Many of the folks from the benchrestcentral link are good friends... here is another thread that discusses the barrel tuners (I'm CubCouper there too.) TUNERS-AGAIN-Bukys-Schmidt-style-versus-Beggs. The info has kinda died down but I'm still interested in the why's. (And I want to make the US world team next year :) $\endgroup$ – CubCouper Jun 3 '15 at 16:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.