I was given the following metric for a sphere

$$g_{\mu\nu} = diag(1, r^2, r^2\sin^2\theta)$$

and tasked to calculate the Christoffel symbols. There are 2 ways that I know of to calculate them. One is from the equation

$$2\Gamma^{\alpha}_{\beta\gamma} = g^{\alpha\rho}(g_{\alpha\rho,~\beta} + g_{\beta\rho,~\alpha} -g_{\alpha\beta,~\rho})$$

and the other way is from the Lagrangian $L$.

What puzzles me: For the 1st method, say if I want to calculate $\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta}$, I simply get

$$2\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta} = g^{rr}(g_{r\theta,~\theta} + g_{\theta r,~\theta} -g_{\theta\theta,~r})$$

and with only the last term surviving, I get $\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta} = -r$. Also, $\Gamma^{r}_{\phi\phi} = -r\sin^2\theta$

For the 2nd method I have $L = g_{\mu\nu}\dot{x}^\mu\dot{x}^\nu = \dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2 + r^2\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2$, and by Euler-Lagrange equation I get for the radial component

$$2\ddot{r} - (2r\dot{\theta}^2 + 2r\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2) = 0$$

and here is where I do not get it. I have to compare the coefficients with the equation

$$\ddot{r} + \Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta}\dot{\theta}^2 = 0$$

to extract out $\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta}$ but there is this $2r\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2$ term which prevents me from direct comparison. Even if I assume that the equation may actually be a combination of 2 equations namely,

$$a\ddot{r} + 2\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta}\dot{\theta}^2 = 0$$


$$(2-a)\ddot{r} + 2\Gamma^{r}_{\phi\phi}\dot{\phi}^2 = 0$$

where $a$ is some constant. The only way to retrieve the correct $\Gamma^{r}_{\theta\theta}$ is for $a=2$. In this case I would not be able to retrieve $\Gamma^{r}_{\phi\phi}$. Any clues?


The geodesic equation is

$$ \frac{d^2x^\mu}{dt^2} + \Gamma^\mu_{\nu \rho} \frac{dx^\nu}{dt}\frac{dx^\rho}{dt} = 0$$

The coefficient of $\dot{\phi}^2$ you're seeing corresponds to $\Gamma^r_{\phi\phi}$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ The problem is that in $2\ddot{r} - (2r\dot{\theta}^2 + 2r\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2) = 0$ there are $\dot{\theta}^2$ and $\dot{\phi}^2$. Can't seem to be able to make a straightforward comparison. $\endgroup$ – Spaceman Spiff May 10 '15 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ @SpacemanSpiff Remember that in my formula there's a sum over $\nu$ and $\rho$, that's why there are $\dot{\theta}^2$ and $\dot{\phi}^2$ terms. $\endgroup$ – Javier May 10 '15 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ I get it now. Once I divide my equation by 2 the coefficients of each first-order terms are simply the Christoffel symbols. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Spaceman Spiff May 10 '15 at 16:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.