I'm stuck pretty much at the first hurdle trying to follow the derivation of the geodesic equations from the Lagrangian $L\left(\dot{x}^{c},x^{c}\right)\equiv\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\left(x_{c}\right)\dot{x}^{a}\dot{x}^{b}$ in Foster and Nightingale's A Short Course in General Relativity.

Differentiating the Lagrangian they give $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{x}^{c}}=\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\delta_{c}^{a}\dot{x}^{b}+\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\dot{x}^{a}\delta_{c}^{b},$$ which I can see, because $\frac{\partial\dot{x}^{a}}{\partial\dot{x}^{c}}$ is 1 only when $a=c$ (otherwise equals zero), and $\frac{\partial\dot{x}^{b}}{\partial\dot{x}^{c}}$ is 1 only when $b=c$ (otherwise equals zero). However, they then go on to say that the above simplifies to $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{x}^{c}}=g_{cb}\dot{x}^{b}.$$

How do they do that? Why do the indices change on the metric? I'm a self-taught plodder, so please don't worry about making your answers too simple.


The metric times the Kronecker delta gives

$$g_{ab} \delta^a_c = g_{cb}$$

Since the Kronecker delta tells us to replace the $a$ indice with $c$. We do this for both terms in your equation,

$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^c} = \frac{1}{2} g_{cb} \dot{x}^b + \frac{1}{2} g_{ac} \dot{x}^a$$

and then rename the dummy indices (the indices that are summed over) so that both terms have the same form. Adding them gives

$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^c} = g_{cb}\dot{x}^b$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the Kronecker delta renames the index. I see it now. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Peter4075 May 10 '15 at 11:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.