4
$\begingroup$

I've been reading the famous unpublished paper by Luescher and Mack "The energy momentum tensor of critical quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions". In the proof of their main theorem, page 7 of the manuscript, they write:

"$$ <0|O_k^\dagger(x) O_k(y)|0> = B_k (x-y-i\varepsilon)^{2k-6}, \quad B_k\in\mathbb{C},\; x \in\mathbb{R} $$

This distribution should be positive. As is well known [5], this implies $2k-6\le 0$. Thus $O_k = 0$ for $k>3$."

[5] is Gelfand, Shilov "Generalized functions, Vol I".
Here $k=0,1,2,\dots$

I found in this book that for $\lambda = -n$, where $n$ is a positive integer,

$$ (x-i0)^{-n}=x^{-n} + \frac{i\pi(-1)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\delta^{(n-1)}(x), $$

where the distribution $x^{-n}$ for $n=2m$, i.e. $n$ even, is defined

$$ (x^{-2m},\phi)=\int_0^\infty x^{-2m}\left(\phi(x)+\phi(-x)-2\left[\phi(0)+\frac{x^2}{2!}\phi''(0)+\dots+\frac{x^{2m-2}}{(2m-2)!}\phi^{(2m-2)}(0)\right]\right)dx $$

I tried calculating the inner product with $\phi(x)=\exp(-x^2)\ge 0$ for various $\lambda$'s. However, for $\lambda = -2$ I got $$ ((x-i0)^{-2},\phi)=(x^{-2},\phi)=\\ \int_0^\infty \frac{\phi(x)+\phi(-x)-2\phi(0)}{x^2}dx=\int_0^\infty \frac{2\exp(-x^2)-2}{x^2}dx=-2\sqrt\pi<0 $$ so that according to Lieb and Loss "Analysis" definition of a positive distribution, $(x-i0)^{-2}$ is not positive, whereas according to the paper the distribution should be positive at least for $\lambda=-6, -4, -2,0$.

Definition of positive distribution (Lieb and Loss)
A distribution $T\in \mathcal{D}'(\Omega)$ is positive if $T(\phi) \ge 0\; \forall \phi \ge 0$, where $\phi\in \mathcal{D}(\Omega)$. Here $\phi \ge 0$ means that $\phi(x) \ge 0 \;\, \forall x\in\Omega \subset \mathbb{R^n}$.

The paper can be found here, the operators $O_k$ are defined on page 6: Luescher and Mack "The energy momentum tensor of critical quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions"

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I am not sure if you mean $x$ one or two dimensional variable. I don't have the article at hand but I guess we probably mean $D=1$??

The argument goes as follows: you have to use Bochner's theorem, which says that $W(x-y):=W_2(x,y)$ is positive distribution if and only if the Fourier transformation yields is a positive measure $\tilde W(p) d^Dp$.

In this case the Fourier transformation is something like $$ \tilde W (p) \sim \frac{\theta(p_0)\theta(p^2)}{(p^2)^{\frac D2 +\lambda}} $$ see e.g. Remark 2.2. in Ref. 1.

Then you get for $\lambda \geq 0$ this is not integrable. Also $d=0$ is a trivial special case.

Reference:

  1. N. M. Nikolov & I. T. Todorov, "Rationality of Conformally Invariant Local Correlation Functions on Compactified Minkowski Space", Commun. Math. Phys. 218 (2001) 417-436, arXiv:hep-th/0009004.
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I'll have a look at it later today. The article $\endgroup$
    – Gytis
    Commented Aug 13, 2015 at 16:57
  • $\begingroup$ I think your answer is right and I have seen something similar elsewhere. Now I am interested where my calculation went wrong so I posted a follow-up question. $\endgroup$
    – Gytis
    Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 1:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.