My prof gives an example of trying to solve the equations of motion for a series of gliders each connected by springs, with the same spring constant. From looking at the $j-1$ through $j+1$ glider, he got the following: \begin{equation}mx^{\prime\prime}_j = \omega_0^2 (x_{j+1} - 2x_j + x_{j-1}).\end{equation} This I understand.

Solving $x'' = \omega_0 ^2 (A_{j+1} -2A_j + A_{j-1})$ using $x=A_je^{-\imath \omega t}$ gives the solution \begin{equation}\left[2-\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^2\right]A_j = A_{j+1} + A_{j-1}.\end{equation} I can follow this step.

Why does this mean it has solutions, $A_j = A_+ e^{\imath\, \theta j}$ and $A_- e^{-\imath\,\theta j}$? This is what my lecture notes say.

I thought $A_+$ might be $A_{j+1}$ divided by $\left[2-\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^2\right]$, but then why did the exponent on the $e$ change?

  • $\begingroup$ Basically, we want to find $A_j$ as a function of $j$. It turns out that both $A_j=A_+ e^{i\theta j}$ and $A_j=A_- e^{-i\theta j}$ work, for some $A_+$, $A_-$, and $\theta$ independent of $j$. You should be able to find $\theta$ in terms of $\omega$ and $\omega_0$. $\endgroup$ – leongz May 4 '15 at 7:25

Basically this is just the solution to the recurrence formula, look here. They show how to solve recurrence relation using difference equation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.