My prof gives an example of trying to solve the equations of motion for a series of gliders each connected by springs, with the same spring constant. From looking at the $j-1$ through $j+1$ glider, he got the following: \begin{equation}mx^{\prime\prime}_j = \omega_0^2 (x_{j+1} - 2x_j + x_{j-1}).\end{equation} This I understand.
Solving $x'' = \omega_0 ^2 (A_{j+1} -2A_j + A_{j-1})$ using $x=A_je^{-\imath \omega t}$ gives the solution \begin{equation}\left[2-\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^2\right]A_j = A_{j+1} + A_{j-1}.\end{equation} I can follow this step.
Why does this mean it has solutions, $A_j = A_+ e^{\imath\, \theta j}$ and $A_- e^{-\imath\,\theta j}$? This is what my lecture notes say.
I thought $A_+$ might be $A_{j+1}$ divided by $\left[2-\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^2\right]$, but then why did the exponent on the $e$ change?