Invariance of Fermionic action under Lorentz transformations Suppose I have an Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}g_{ab} \bar{\psi}^a \Gamma^k \partial_k \psi^b $$ and I want to show it's invariance under the infinitesimal Lorentz transformations $$\delta \psi^a = -\Lambda_{mn}x^m \partial^n \psi^a + \frac{1}{2} \Lambda_{mn} \Sigma^{mn}\psi^a ,$$ $$\delta \bar{\psi}^a = -\Lambda_{mn}x^m \partial^n \bar{\psi}^a - \frac{1}{2} \Lambda_{mn} \bar{\psi}^a \Sigma^{mn},$$ where $\Lambda_{mn}$ are the components of an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation and hence antisymmetric, and $\Sigma^{mn}$ are the generators of the spinor representation of the Lorentz group. I proceed the usual way and after some algebra get that $$\delta \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\Lambda_{mn}[x^m \partial^n \bar{\psi}^a \Gamma^k \partial_k \psi^b + x^m \bar{\psi}^a \Gamma^k \partial_k(\partial^n \psi^b) + \bar{\psi}^a \Gamma^m \partial^n \psi^b ].$$ This needs to be written as a total derivative, but I can't seem to achieve this. For example if I try $$\partial^m (\Lambda_{mn} x^n \mathcal{L}),$$ I get the first two, but not the third term. Can anyone tell me how to proceed?
 A: It was pointed out by @Peter Anderson in the comment that you forgot the transformation of the derivative, which in infinitesimal form should read
$$\delta \partial_n = - g^{lm} \Lambda_{mn}\partial_l$$
which comes from the Lorentz transformation
$$\partial_n \to g^{lm}(L^{-1})_{mn} \partial_l$$
(the metric is there to keep the indices in agreement with OP's choice) which expands to
$$ g^{lm}(L^{-1})_{mn} =  \delta^l_n - g^{lm} \Lambda_{mn} + ... $$
where I'm inferring, from your other transformation laws, that you are applying active Lorentz transformations, i.e. under the symbolic perspective
$$x \to L x$$
with a field transforming as
$$\phi(x) \to M \phi(L^{-1} x)$$
being $M$ a representation of the Lorentz group.
If you use this you will get a new term in the variation of your Lagrangian
$$ \delta \mathcal{L}  -\frac{1}{2} g_{ab} \Lambda_{mn} \overline \psi^a \Gamma^n g^{lm}\partial_l \psi^b$$
and this new term with the last term of your variation hold
$$-\frac{1}{2} g_{ab} \Lambda_{mn}\left[ \overline \psi^a \Gamma^m \partial^n \psi^b+\overline \psi^a \Gamma^n \partial^m \psi^b \right]$$
and so you have a contraction between an anti-symmetric tensor $\Lambda_{mn}$ with a symmetrised quantity $\Gamma^m \partial^n+\Gamma^n \partial^m$ and hence these two terms vanish. You are then left with the first two, which you already said you can rewrite them in a total derivative form.
