I think that charging symmetry assumes antiparticle presence, which has an opposite charge sign . And what symmetry assumes existence of an antiparticle at a neutral particle
2
-
$\begingroup$ See also this question. $\endgroup$ – Peter Shor Dec 2 '11 at 1:00
-
$\begingroup$ Would it be possible to clarify the question title? And the question body, for that matter? I don't quite understand what it's asking... $\endgroup$ – David Z Dec 2 '11 at 9:39
Add a comment
|
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
2
Anti-matter is not just the opposite charge sign. To convert matter to anti-matter you apply the C-parity operation which change more quantum numbers than just charge. In the case of the neutrino the lepton number is switched,
-
1$\begingroup$ But Majorana neutrinos are their own antiparticles. $\endgroup$ – Peter Shor Dec 2 '11 at 1:02
-