5
$\begingroup$

The cross section of top quark pair production is dominated at the LHC by gluon-gluon fusion, whereas at Tevatron, quark-antiquark annihilation is more prevalent. Why is this?

I know the fundamental difference between these colliders is that the LHC collides $pp$ pairs and the Tevatron collides $p\bar{p}$ pairs, so is it related to the parton distribution functions in some way?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ A small part of the answer is that antiprotons have antiquarks, while protons have quarks, so there are fewer q-qbar collisions possible, but IIRC the bigger factor is indeed the PDFs, which tilts much more towards the gluon sea at higher energies. $\endgroup$
    – jwimberley
    Apr 15, 2015 at 10:47

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

In order to create a top quark pair you need at least an energy of $2 m_t$.

At Tevatron, the energy available is about 1 TeV per beam, where beam1 is a proton beam and beam2 an anti-proton beam. For simplicity, let's pick-up a parton with an energy $m_t = 173$ GeV from a proton and another parton with $E=m_t$ from the anti-proton. The ratio of the energy of the partons with respect to the (anti-)proton will be of the order of $x=0.17$ ($x$ is the Bjorken variable). Looking at the parton distribution function (a.k.a. PDF), you'll see that such relatively large $x$ is dominated by valence quarks and thus $u,u,d$ in proton and $\bar{u},\bar{u},\bar{d}$ in anti-proton. (An example of PDF is given in figure 19.4 of this link: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2014/reviews/rpp2014-rev-structure-functions.pdf ). Hence, the production of $t\bar{t}$ from quark-anti-quark is likely to happen at Tevatron.

At LHC, the situation is different because the energy of the beams is about 6.5 times larger. Hence, $x$ value is decreased by this factor. Typically, for $x$ below 0.1, you'll see that the probability to pick-up a gluon is much larger than a quarks (or anti-quarks). Notice, that the PDF of the gluon is divided by a factor 10 in the plot! So LHC collisions are largely dominated by gluon fusion production.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.