Is there any 1st order electromagnetic Feynman diagram? I.e. a process whose probability is just $\propto \alpha_{EM}$?

If not, is there any physical reason why? We always need at least two particles in and two out to conserve energy and momentum?


A diagram which is first order in $\alpha_\text{EM}$ would have to have one vertex, because $\alpha_\text{EM}\propto g^2$ where $g$ is the factor associated with each vertex (and the amplitude corresponding to the diagram gets squared). There's only one possible vertex in QED, namely the photon-electron-positron vertex, and it's impossible to arrange this in any way that conserves energy and momentum. There are only two really distinct possibilities:

  • initial state photon, final state electron and positron: the final state has a rest frame and the initial state doesn't. Or vice-versa (initial state $e^-e^+$, final state $\gamma$)
  • initial state photon and electron, final state electron, or vice versa: in the rest frame of the final state, the total energy is $m_e c^2$, whereas the initial state has energy at least $m_e c^2 + E_\gamma$

So no, there is no first-order diagram. The same argument goes to show that the corresponding process ($\gamma\to e^+e^-$, $e^-\gamma\to e^-$, or any variant) is kinematically forbidden. If you replace the photon with a sufficiently massive particle, like a Z boson, then it's totally fine. Of course, Z bosons aren't stable, so whatever diagram you draw that includes the $Z\to e^+e^-$ vertex should probably also include whatever interaction produced the Z boson in the first place, but in theory if you had a free Z boson propagating through space, it could undergo this decay.

Note the distinction I've drawn between a diagram and a process, which is defined by its initial and final states but incorporates many different diagrams.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ what about 2 photons and 1 electron, Compton scattering? Photon coming in, scattered electron and photon coming out? I'm guessing the electron can't just pop of nowhere though... $\endgroup$ – SuperCiocia Apr 14 '15 at 19:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Exactly, conservation of charge, or lepton number, or angular momentum, etc. requires that you have a fermion going in for each one going out. Or, more fundamentally, there is no $\gamma\gamma e$ vertex in QED. $\endgroup$ – David Z Apr 14 '15 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.