2
$\begingroup$

In almost every reference site I can find, the Sommerfeld parameter $\eta$ is explicitly stated as

$$\eta=\frac{Z_1Z_2e^2}{\hbar \nu}=\frac{Z_1Z_2e^2}{\hbar }\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{2E}}$$

Where $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are the atomic numbers of the two nuclei involved, $\mu$ is the reduced mass of the two nuclei, and $E$ is the approximate center of mass energy of the the nuclei, and $v$ is the relative velocity of the nuclei.

The problem I have with this is that it is not dimensionless as it should be. The units of what I have just wrote down are

$$\frac{\textrm{(Coulomb)}^2}{\textrm{(Energy)(Length)}}$$

However, when I check numerically with other references, it seems like it is defined to be

$$\eta=\frac{Z_1Z_2e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}\hbar c}\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{2E}}=\alpha Z_1Z_2\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{2E}}$$

Where $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant, and $\mu$ is the reduced mass in terms of energy/$c^2$. This makes sense, but is not what is explicitly stated as the Sommerfeld parameter.

What exactly is the definition of the Sommerfeld parameter? Must I go through the solution of the Schrodinger equation for a two-nuclei system (woods-saxon + yukawa potential) to derive this for myself?

References:

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The first formula is written in the Gaussian unit system, while the second one is in the SI system. In the Gaussian system, the unit of electric charge is $statC =g^{1/2}cm^{3/2}s^{-1}$. So, the Sommefeld parameter in the Gaussian unit system is dimensionless as it would be.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a general rule, many of these unit issues can be fixed by a factor of $4\pi\epsilon_0$, which is unity in CGS units but has dimension $\rm (coulomb)^2 (joule)^{-1}(meter)^{-1}$ in SI. $\endgroup$ – rob Apr 13 '15 at 12:12
0
$\begingroup$

Simply multiply by $d/d$, where $d$ is a arbitrary distance, then the unit of $d/(hv)$ will be (Joule)^(-1), and $\frac{Z_1Z_2e^2}{d}$ will be in $J$. Then the product is dimensionless.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello and welcome to StackExchange! Please consider using LaTeX for better readability. You can introduce simple LaTeX formula between dollar signs. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sep 28 '15 at 11:41
  • $\begingroup$ To extend Martin's comment, see this link on using MathJax. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Sep 28 '15 at 11:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.