0
$\begingroup$

If we look at the Lagrange's equation

$\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}})- \frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i}=0$

It is clear that Lagrangian is invariant under a Transformation $L \rightarrow L + \frac{dF (q_i,t)}{dt}$

because $\frac{\partial \dot{F}(q_i,t)}{\partial \dot{q_i}} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial q} $

But when we look at the action,

$A=\int L{dt}$,

A transformation of the kind $L \rightarrow L + \frac{dF(q_i, \dot{q_i}, t)}{dt}$ would leave the extrema of action invariant and hence the equations of motion should also be invariant(according to the principle of least action) because the total time derivative of $F$ would contribute just a constant.

So under what kind of transformation are equations of motion invariant? $L \rightarrow L + \frac{dF (q_i,t)}{dt}$ or $L \rightarrow L + \frac{dF(q_i, \dot{q_i}, t)}{dt}$

I mean what kind of function should F be? Is it allowed to have explicit dependence on $\dot{q_i}$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The Euler-Lagrange equation holds for Lagrangians that depend on at most first order derivatives of $q$. But when we take the transformation: $$L' = L+\frac{dF(q,\dot q,t)}{dt} $$ we find that our new Lagrangian now has a dependence on the second order derivative of $q$: $$L' = L+\frac{dF(q,\dot q,t)}{dt} = L+\frac{\partial F}{\partial q}\frac{dq}{dt}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot q}\frac{d\dot q}{dt}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}$$ $$= L+\frac{\partial F}{\partial q}\dot q+\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot q}\ddot q+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}$$ and so the new Lagrangian now depends on $\ddot{q}$. The only way to avoid the new Lagrangian depending on $\ddot{q}$ is to demand that $$\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot q} = 0$$ which brings us back to the case where $F$ depends only on $q$ and $t$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.