If I use Gauss' theorem I find that, for $r\geq R$

$$V(r) = \frac{\sigma R^2}{\epsilon_0 r} = \frac{Q_{sphere}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r}$$

where $\sigma$ is the surface charge density and $R$ the radius of the sphere.

But if I use the "direct" formula, I find that

$$V(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\iint_{sphere}\frac{\sigma(P)}{||\vec{PM}||}dS$$

with $P\in sphere$

and since the sphere is uniformly charged and $||\vec{PM}|| = |r-R|$

$$V(r) = \frac{\sigma}{4\pi\epsilon_0|r-R|}\iint_{sphere}dS = \frac{Q_{sphere}}{4\pi\epsilon_0|r-R|}$$

What am I doing wrong ?


closed as off-topic by ACuriousMind, Kyle Kanos, JamalS, Jim, Constandinos Damalas Apr 9 '15 at 18:47

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – ACuriousMind, Kyle Kanos, JamalS, Jim, Constandinos Damalas
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ physics.stackexchange.com/a/174609/75518 $\endgroup$ – image Apr 7 '15 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ Why do I need a dirac delta ? What is wrong with what I wrote ? $\endgroup$ – mwa1 Apr 7 '15 at 15:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you just do the integral over $r'$ you'll get the integral over the surface of your sphere. The way I solved it, is just a way to show you, where this surface integration comes from and that one can forumalte a proper charge density for this kind of problem. The dirac-delta ensures, that the charge is only on the surface $\endgroup$ – image Apr 7 '15 at 15:31
  • $\begingroup$ I still don't understand what went wrong with my developement... Also, what does $d^3r'$ mean ? I don't understand this notation $\endgroup$ – mwa1 Apr 7 '15 at 19:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $ \int f \ \ d^3r\ ' $ denotes a volume integral over $f$ independant of the choise of coordinates. $\endgroup$ – image Apr 7 '15 at 20:17

The "direct" formula is $$V(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int\frac{dQ}{\lvert \vec{r}-\vec{R} \rvert}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\iint_{sphere}\frac{\sigma(\vec{R})dS}{\lvert \vec{r}-\vec{R} \rvert}.$$

Now, think carefully about what the $\frac{1}{\lvert \vec{r}-\vec{R} \rvert}$ means---it is the reciprocal of the distance from an arbitrary point on the surface of the sphere to the point where you are calculating the electrostatic potential. So as you integrate over the surface of the sphere, this distance changes, and so you cannot pull it out of the integral as you did above. To actually evaluate the integral, you would need to write $dS$ and $\frac{1}{\lvert \vec{r}-\vec{R} \rvert}$ in terms of, for instance, the polar coordinates $\theta$ and $\phi$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ok, thanks. The $1/r$ factor was a typo, I got rid of it. $\endgroup$ – mwa1 Apr 7 '15 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, good! I'll take that part out of my answer. $\endgroup$ – Mike Bell Apr 7 '15 at 20:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.