Show that if the wave function $\langle x|\psi\rangle$ is modified by a position-dependent phase $\langle x|\psi\rangle \to e^{\frac{ip_ox}{\hbar}}\langle x|\psi\rangle$ then $\langle x\rangle \to \langle x \rangle$ and $\langle p_x\rangle \to \langle p_x\rangle +p_o.$

In my earlier question here I made the mistake where I commuted the translation operator with the position observable, which you can't do. But, here you can, which confuses me.

Expanding in Taylor series for $\exp\left(i\frac{p_{0}}{\hbar}\hat{x}\right)$:

$$ \exp\left(i\frac{p_{0}}{\hbar}\hat{x}\right) \approx 1+\frac{ip_ox}{\hbar} $$

Expanding in Taylor series for my earlier question $\exp\left(-i\frac{p_{x}}{\hbar}\delta x\right)$: $$ \exp\left(-i\frac{p_{x}}{\hbar}\delta x\right) \approx 1-\frac{ip_x\delta x}{\hbar}. $$

Since they are both translation operators why does one commute with the position observable and the other does not?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well in one $\delta x$ is an infinitesimal scalar, and in the other $\hat{x}$ is an operator with finite eigenvalues. So the first expansion is incorrect. $\endgroup$ – user12029 Apr 4 '15 at 20:36

In this case $p_0$ is just a number. It's the amount of phase that you add to the wave function. $\text{e}^{ip_0 x/\hbar}$ is not a translation operator. It's just multiplying the wave function by a complex number of norm $1$.

In you previous question you had $\hat{p}$ which is an operator. It acts on the wave function by differentiating it.

  • $\begingroup$ I see, thank you very much! Once I reach 15 reps, I will upvote your answer. $\endgroup$ – Luffy Apr 4 '15 at 21:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.