Recently,I read some papers about non-abelian statistics of majorana fermion, such as: Majorana Returns F. Wilczek http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v5/n9/full/nphys1380.html and Non-Abelian Statistics of Half-Quantum Vortices in p-Wave Superconductors D. A. Ivanov http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.268.

All of these tell me that the interchanging between two vortexes containing majorana fermion or zero mode will lead to a anyonic matrix phase factor. This conclusion deeply perplex me because the basic fact that the majorana fermion is a fermion which many body non-interacting wavefunction is interchanging anti-symmetry and the resulting phase factor is -1. I don't understand why the vortex containing it is non-Abelian statistics in the way of picture even though I carefully check the mathematics in Ivanov's paper.

anyone having a good knowledge about this area, please help, thanks!

I also read the similar question: Majorana particles statistics (Majorana particles statistics) and the answer of prof. Wen.From his answer, I have know that this a confusing. But, I still don't be clear about why the interchanging of vortexes lead to a non-Abelian operation,when these vortexes are represented by majorana field operator $\gamma$ in Ivanov's paper. In my option, at this time, the vortexes are also fermion which only phase factor -1. Which point I was wrong? Please help me, thanks.


This is why people start to abandon calling the zero modes in vortices "Majorana fermions" because they are NOT fermions. $\gamma$ is a Majorana zero mode, which means it always has to pair up with another Majorana zero mode to form a 2-dimensional Hilbert space. Exchanging vortices generates a nontrivial unitary transformation on the degenerate space.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ you mean that the majorana zero mode is not a majorana fermion? It hard to understand that because the field operator $\gamma$ satisfying self-conjugate and the corresponding quasiparticle is fermion(anti-commute). Did you mean there is only the feature of "self-conjugate" (so named "majorana"), but no the feature of fermion? thanks $\endgroup$ – alxandernashzhang Apr 3 '15 at 1:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Self-conjugation is special. Usually fermion operators satisfy $c^2=(c^\dagger)^2=0$. $\endgroup$ – Meng Cheng Apr 3 '15 at 3:04
  • $\begingroup$ I know the quasiparticle operator forms a new clifford algbra and these operators also obey anti-commute relation. Can I seem these zero modes form a representation of the algebra and serve as a basis function, at this time, the interchanging in real space correspond to a unitary transformation in the Hilbert space, thus different zero mode will mixing by the unitary transformation? So, it is a non-Abelian occurring in hilbert space rather than real space? thanks! $\endgroup$ – alxandernashzhang Apr 3 '15 at 3:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.