6
$\begingroup$

This question comes from @Floris' speculation at the end of his excellent answer about what it would take to kill everyone on the Earth with electricity.

Doing all this in 1/10th of a second requires an instantaneous power of $7 \cdot 10^{27} W$ which is a bit larger than the power output of the sun (which is $4\cdot 10^{26}W$ according to Wolfram alpha

This being the case, I think we're pretty safe. The only way Dr Evil could get away with this plan is to do it in reverse: first pump the charge off the earth to the moon (slowly), then let it all flow back in a cosmic lightning strike. I am not absolutely sure that the moon would stay in orbit while we charge it up... electrostatic attraction would get pretty strong. But that might be the topic for another post.

Here's that other post!

  • Can you cause lightning to jump between the Earth and the Moon?

  • What scale of energy and charge would it take?

  • Before the lightning cancelled out the charge, how much would the electromagnetic attraction alter the orbit of the Moon?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Given that a vacuum is a perfect insulator, I'm not sure you'd get as much an arcing discharge as you would get massive tunneling of electrons from one to the other. But Oh My God! The potential difference would be enormous! You could probably kill everything with just the electric field. What a capacitor that would be $\endgroup$ – Jim Mar 31 '15 at 17:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The electrostatic force from the charge required to build up this voltage would be several orders of magnitude larger than the gravitational force between the earth and moon. Assuming you could hold the charge in place, the orbit would be affected long before you get a spark. $\endgroup$ – BowlOfRed Mar 31 '15 at 20:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Jimnosperm--but space isn't a perfect vacuum... Though I wonder if anyone's done studies on the ionization field for such diffuse gas, either. $\endgroup$ – Jerry Schirmer Mar 31 '15 at 20:29
4
$\begingroup$

Based on the calculation in my earlier answer, we were going to try to charge the earth with $10^{12}C$ and put that charge on the moon. Sending all the charge back in a giant lightning strike would then cause such a rapid change in electric field (not to mention that it dumps all the energy of twelve suns for a tenth of a second...) that it would electrocute every human being on the planet not in a well shielded cage (and those would probably just fry instead).

I then speculated about the forces and fields that would arise from that charge...

The force between two spheres each charged with $Q=10^{12}C$, distance $R = 4\cdot 10^8 m$ apart, is

$$F_e = \frac{Q^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}\approx 5\cdot 10^{16}N$$

By comparison, the force of gravity is

$$F_g = \frac{GMm}{R^2} \approx 2\cdot 10^{20} N$$

So it won't make the moon crash - but it might speed up the orbit a little bit. More full moons. Werewolves, rejoice!

Now as for the electrical discharge. Earlier, I calculated that the field strength of earth was about 200 MV/m. The dielectric breakdown of air occurs at about 3 MV/m - see this source. More precisely, if we look at the Paschen curve for air, it is given by

$$V_b = \frac{apd}{\ln(pd)+b}$$

Where for air, $a=4\cdot 10^7 V/(atm\cdot m)$, $b=12.8$, and $p= 1 atm$. For $d = 4\cdot 10^8 m$, the breakdown voltage (using the ridiculous assumption that the air pressure is the same all the way) would be $5\cdot 10^{14} V$ - and that was a very generous estimate. More realistic would be that the potential difference reached is such that the field reaches 3 MV/m - 1/70th of the desired potential difference.

What will happen long before we reach the desired potential difference is this - the atmosphere will be ionized on the side of the moon (where the field strength is greatest) and ions will start to be attracted to the moon (assuming that the potential difference was set up with the earth net positive, and the moon net negative). These ions will arrive at the moon with tremendous energy - enough to vaporize bits of moon on impact and create a plasma which in turn will be ripped apart by the electric field and run towards the earth.

Previously we calculated the energy associated with the full potential difference as $10^{26} J$ - but that was when the full charge was reached. At 1/70th of the voltage we will have about 1/5000th of the energy, so $2\cdot 10^{22}J$. If half of that is used to burn a hole in the moon, you can melt a big hole. How big?

Heat capacity of lava roughly 1 kJ/(kg K); latent heat of fusion of rock 400 kJ/kg (source), and boiling point around 2500 K (2230 C for quartz). I could not find the latent heat of vaporization of rock, but based on other silicon based compounds, I will put it at 8000 kJ/kg (somewhere between the value for iron and silicon).

So taking one kg of moon and vaporizing it takes roughly

8,000 + 2,000 * 1 + 400 ~ 10,000 kJ

Update:

According to this reference the specific energy of granite is 26 kJ/cm3, and the density of granite is about 2.6 g/cm3. That makes my estimate of the power required to vaporize rock surprisingly accurate.

This means that this lightning strike will vaporize $10^{22-7}=10^{15} kg$ of moon. At a density of about $3.3 \cdot 10^3 kg/m^3$ that is a volume of 300 cubic kilometers of moon - a sphere of about 8 km diameter. And all that matter will be vaporized, ionized, and hurtling about in space. The most spectacular fireworks you will ever see - and not be able to tell the grandkids about.

A similar hole will be made on earth, of course. I think the fact that we'll be getting electrocuted is dropping lower down on the list of causes of death - of the planet.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "while lightning strikes..." Even today, an ordinary lightning strike will cause the sand to melt (did you see "Sweet Home Alabama"?). There is SO much energy in this bolt that a bit of air isn't going to stop it - it will heat, expand, and leave a void for the ions to travel through. My point is that the lightning current will carry half the total energy (minus the energy to ionize the atmosphere - that's not going to save the earth). $\endgroup$ – Floris Apr 1 '15 at 15:22
  • $\begingroup$ If I understand you correctly and to sum up, the charge difference will be so great that it will ionize and tear away enough of the atmosphere of the Earth to form an ion bridge between the Earth and the Moon? That's why your energy levels are 27 orders of magnitude off from @levitopher, because they're assuming a perfect vacuum? $\endgroup$ – Schwern Apr 1 '15 at 20:43
  • $\begingroup$ I was working from the previous answer, looking to move "just" $10^{12}C$ across. That already creates a surface electric field that far exceeds the breakdown voltage of air, yadayada. You never get anywhere near the Schwinger limit. Even in an initially perfect vacuum you would get field emission followed by ionization, and runaway breakdown as the ion current heats the surface. $\endgroup$ – Floris Apr 1 '15 at 21:17
1
$\begingroup$

I will estimate the potential difference, and later add in the other considerations. I am taking the entire space between the Earth and Moon to be vacuum - so I am totally ignoring the effects of the Earth's atmosphere. The Swinger Limit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_limit) is the largest electric field that can exist before nonlinear effects start to dominate, so let's take that as the electrical breakdown of space (these are roughly the same concepts). This is $1.3\times 10^{18}$ V/m. The Earth and the Moon are separated by ~380 000 km, so the potential difference required is

$$V_{max}=4.94\times 10^{26} V$$

To find the total energy required to set up this potential, I will consider the Earth-Moon system as a pair of conducting spheres, find their capacitance, and calculate $U=\frac{1}{2}CV^2$. One can find their capacitance using the method of images - the answer is an infinite sum, the first few terms of which is

$$C=4\pi\epsilon R_1 \left(1+\frac{R_1R_2}{R^2-R_2^2}+\frac{R_1^2R_2^2}{R^2(R^2-R_2^2-R_1^2)-R_2^2(R^2-R_2^2)}+...\right)$$

Where the radius of the Earth is $R_1$, the radius of the Moon is $R_2$, and their centers are separated by $R$ (if you want to see how to do this with two spheres of the same radius, check out this page. My generalization comes pretty easily from that). Fortunately, even just taking the first term here is good enough, because the second is $\sim 7.70\times 10^{-5}$. So the capacitance of this system is

$$C\approx7.12\times 10^{-4}\text{ F}$$

Actually not overly impressive, but with the potential above the energy required to charge the system is

$$U\approx 8.68\times 10^{49}\text{ J}$$

Assuming our supervillain had access to a power plant at least as powerful as the most powerful nuclear one on Earth (Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, 8000 MW), this would take $\sim 10^{32}$ yrs to do. Outside of current technological demands, to say the least.

So would there be other consequences of this? Well, using the method of images above, one can find the amount of charge on the Earth:

$$q_1=4\pi\epsilon R_1V_{max}\approx 3.52\times 10^{23}\text{ C},$$ and the Moon would be

$$q_2=-\frac{R_2}{R}q\approx -1.61\times10^{21} \text{ C}.$$

(The net charge here is not zero because I have made one of the conductors grounded - I'm not sure that makes too much sense in this context, but I doubt it would change the results significantly).

So the ratio of the gravitational force to the Coulomb force would be

$$\frac{F_G}{F_C}=\frac{\frac{GM_1M_2}{R^2}}{\frac{kq_1q_2}{R^2}}\approx 5.7\times 10^{-18}$$

So, as mentioned in the other answer, we would see what was happening on the Moon due to the buildup of charge far before the charge could go off. This should be expected of course - we are pushing the limits of the electromagnetic force in a perfectly classical gravitating system. I think this supervillain would crash the Moon into the Earth before even getting a chance to pull off his grand plan!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So I understand why you and @Floris are off on the energy required by 27 orders of magnitude, you're calculating the energy required to cause lightning to jump across the vacuum gap between the Earth and the Moon. Floris is calculating the energy needed to form a sort of plasma bridge between the Earth and the Moon and the lightning travels across that? $\endgroup$ – Schwern Apr 1 '15 at 20:41
  • $\begingroup$ I think this is a huge overestimate of the required potential. Even in a vacuum you will get field emission at much lower fields. At 0K, a field of 0.4 V / nm is sufficient for electrons to escape - ("Vacuum electronics: components and devices", Eichmeier, Ch 10.2.3) this is many (15) orders of magnitude below your 5E26 V/m. $\endgroup$ – Floris Apr 1 '15 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ I agree, the estimate may not be great but it's based on my assumption of total vacuum, and the lack of microscopic details of the physics involved. $\endgroup$ – levitopher Apr 2 '15 at 2:00
-1
$\begingroup$

The maximum Voltage before a current flow will occur from moon to earth is not that Schwinger limit! It is simply the value when field strength at the moons surface (smaller radius than earth) will be high enough to start field emission. Due to roughness of the moons surface this value is not easily calculated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the question was prompted by the earlier (linked) answer that pondered whether $10^{12}C$ could be stored on the Moon, and whether that had an effect on its orbit. We all conclude that you would get breakdown long before you reach that level of charge. For a poor conductor, surface roughness is not a huge contributor to field emission - as soon as currents start to flow it will drop the potential and reduce the field, which is why semiconducting coatings work so well in HV applications. $\endgroup$ – Floris Apr 1 '15 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ Right, it's not easily calculated, which is why I choose the Schwinger limit. It might be something like an upper bound to this whole thing, I agree, but without some effective theory/time to worry about the interplanetary medium, I wanted something concrete to hold onto. $\endgroup$ – levitopher Apr 2 '15 at 2:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.