A non-commutative binomial formula is not a unique notion. Here we consider the formula$^1$
$$\begin{align} (\hat{A}+\hat{B})^n ~=~&\sum_{k=0}^n \begin{pmatrix}n \\k \end{pmatrix}(\hat{C}^k\hat{\bf 1})\hat{B}^{n-k}, \cr
\hat{C}~\equiv~&\hat{A}+ [\hat{B}, \cdot]~\equiv~\hat{A}+ L_\hat{B}- R_\hat{B}, \end{align}\tag{1}$$
from Ref. 1, which in turn is equivalent to
$$ e^{\hat{A}+\hat{B}}~=~(e^{\hat{C}}1)e^{\hat{B}}, \tag{2}$$
$$ (e^{\hat{C}}\hat{\bf 1})~=~e^{\hat{A}+\hat{B}}e^{-\hat{B}}, \tag{3}$$
or
$$ (e^{t\hat{C}}\hat{\bf 1})~=~e^{t\hat{A}+t\hat{B}}e^{-t\hat{B}}. \tag{4}$$
where $t\in\mathbb{R}$ is a parameter.
Proof of eq. (4): First notice that it is trivially true for $t=0$. Next differentiate its left- & right-hand sides wrt. $t$ in order to show that the left- & right-hand sides (collectively called $\hat{S}$) satisfy the same ODE:
$$ \hat{S}^{\prime}(t)~=~\hat{C}\hat{S}(t)~\equiv~\hat{A}\hat{S}(t)+ [\hat{B}, \hat{S}(t)].\tag{5} $$
Hence the left- & right-hand sides of eq. (4) must be equal. $\Box$
References:
- W. Wyss, arXiv:1707.03861 (Hat tip: Dan & BMRodriguez-Lara.)
--
$^1$ Notation: Note that the operator $\hat{C}$ takes operators to operators, e.g.
$$\begin{align} (\hat{C}\hat{\bf 1})~=~&\hat{A}, \cr
(\hat{C}^2\hat{\bf 1})~=~&\hat{A}^2 + [\hat{B},\hat{A}],\cr
(\hat{C}^3\hat{\bf 1})~=~&\hat{A}^3 + [\hat{B},\hat{A}^2] + [\hat{B},[\hat{B},\hat{A}]],\end{align}\tag{6}$$
and so forth.