Bloch oscillations - Scattering to other bands In the free electron approximation, a Bloch state $|k\rangle$ is the linear superposition of free plane wave states $\sum_G C_G(k) |k+G\rangle$, where $G$ are the conjugate lattice. Since the coefficients $C_G$ varies with $k$, under an electric field the electron will not merely shift inside the same band, but will scatter to other bands. Is this effect significant in practice? Also, does the total scattering loss during one complete Bloch oscillation tend to zero as the applied electric field tends to zero?
 A: The premise is not true. Under a uniform electric field in a perfect crystal, the electron moves within a single band, with k changing at a uniform rate. The coefficients $C_G$ change in accordance with the composition of the corresponding Bloch state. You can find a detailed proof in Kittel, "Quantum Theory of Solids".
See Kittel, "Quantum Theory of Solids", p190-193. One way to look at it is, transitions generally don't happen because of the adiabatic theorem. The conditions of the adiabatic theorem are supposedly "difficult to violate over an extended volume of crystal" in this context. (I have not tried to understand exactly what is required for a violation.)
There's another way to formulate the problem, in which you diagonalize a different Hamiltonian:
$H_{\mathbf{F}}=H_0-ie^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\mathbf{F}\cdot\nabla_\mathbf{k}e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}}$
Where F is the electric field and $H_0$ is the unperturbed Hamiltonian. It's not obvious from looking, but this Hamiltonian is susceptible to Bloch's theorem--it has bands like usual. The electric field exactly carries electrons within a single "band" of this modified Hamiltonian. I suppose you can use perturbation theory on the second term to find the scattering rates with respect to the ordinary bands of the crystal.
In practice, my experience involves semiconductor transport at not-especially-high fields. Scattering into another band by electric field alone (as opposed to defects, phonons, etc.) is not at all important in that context; I had never heard of it until now.
A: According to a professor that I asked today, such an effect exists, and is called "Zener Tunneling".
