2
$\begingroup$

I just worked out the 1D free particle solution to the Schrödinger equation.

My wave function was \begin{equation} \psi(x,t) = Ae^{i(px-Et)/\hbar} \end{equation} So I plugged this into both sides of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and started to verify. I did LHS and RHS separately.
I then ended up with \begin{equation} i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi = \frac{1}{2}\frac{p^2}{m}\psi \end{equation}

which looks like the correct form for the free particle solution.

My Confusion

I don't understand where the operators went. Usually when I see the Hamiltonian defined in the time-dependent SE it reads

\begin{equation} i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi = \hat{H}\psi = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\hat{p}^2}{m}\psi \end{equation}

But my answer seemingly is hatless. Above I defined $p = \hbar k$ which is the de Broglie relationship. But the article I got the original wave function from didn't say I needed to make the $p$ in $ \psi(x,t) = Ae^{i(px-Et)/\hbar}$ an operator. So I'm confused what should and should not be an operator.

My Question:

Can someone clarify what should and should not be an operator in my verification of the 1D solution to the SE for a free particle?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Your solution is right. What you get verifying it is that $\psi$ is also an eigenfunction of the momentum operator, which means

$$\hat p\psi=p\psi,$$

where $\hat p=-i\hbar\nabla$ is momentum operator, and $p$ is its eigenvalue.

Now, applying $\hat p$ twice and dividing by $2m$, you can get

$$\frac1{2m}\hat p^2\psi=\frac1{2m}p^2\psi,$$

which is just another form of time-independent Schrödinger's equation for free particle:

$$\frac1{2m}\hat p^2\psi=E\psi.$$

Here $\hat T=\frac1{2m}\hat p^2$ is the kinetic energy operator, and $E$ is its eigenvalue, i.e. energy of the particle in this eigenstate $\psi$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are all solutions to the Schrödinger equation eigenfunctions? I assume not. How do I tell if a given solution to the SE is an eigenfunction? $\endgroup$ – Stan Shunpike Mar 20 '15 at 6:54
  • $\begingroup$ All solutions of time-independent Schrödinger's equation with appropriate boundary conditions are eigenfunctions of Hamiltonian — that's by construction. As for time-dependent SE, the solution can be chosen to be an eigenfunction of an operator of a conserved quantity in a given problem. In your case, this conserved quantity is momentum. If you happened to choose the solution as $\sin$ instead of $\exp$, this choice would correspond to conservation of parity (i.e. such a function has definite parity), while your original choice has definite momentum $p$. $\endgroup$ – Ruslan Mar 20 '15 at 6:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.