The way I understand the holographic principle is that everything in a 3D space can be thought of as living on the 2D boundary of that space. If that is the case, why does everything in the universe look and behave 3D? If the information is not actually stored on a 2D surface, then what does the holographic principle actually say?

I have asked a similar question elsewhere and someone left me a quote from Wikipedia.

"In a larger sense, the theory suggests that the entire universe can be seen as a two-dimensional information structure "painted" on the cosmological horizon, such that the three dimensions we observe are an effective description only at macroscopic scales and at low energies."

If this is the answer, can someone explain it?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The universe, if thought of as spacetime, is 4D, not 3D. The holographic principle is a property of string theories and quantum gravity theories, not of nature as such, or of any theory that has been sufficiently tested. I'm not really sure whether this question makes any sense. The Wikipedia quote is tagged with [clarification needed] and should not be relied on. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Mar 15 '15 at 2:22
  • $\begingroup$ I know it's not proven. I'm speaking hypothetically as if the holographic principle was true for our universe. $\endgroup$ – qwert Mar 15 '15 at 2:36

Let us suppose the holographic principle is indeed correct and that there is a (3+1)-dimensional quantum gravity theory that explains our universe, which has an equivalent description as a (2+1)-dimensional system. This simply means that the two descriptions cannot be distiguished so there is no physical experiment that could determine if we "actually" live in 3 or 2 spatial dimensions.

So your question touches on the question what physics can "actually" tell us about the world. The answer in this case is that two physical models in different dimensions are equivalently good models of the physical world. But that is all that physics can do for us, produce testable predicitions. So the question which one is the "actual" dimension becomes purely philosophical, from a physics standpoint there is no differenced between 3 and 2 dimensions.

why does everything in the universe look and behave 3D?

This is just the way humans interpret their perceptions and the names we have given to these perceptions. If there is an equivalent lower dimensional description of the world around us we can equally well say that the universe "looks" 2-dimensional.

Well, in conclusion you have to refrain from the idea that physics teaches us about what the universe "actually" is, it just provides models that predict thing we can measure. If two physical models yield the same predicitions, there is no way to distinguish between them. If one of these models is actually close to "reality" (whatever that is), is a philosophical questions.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.