What are the final particles emitted from an evaporating black hole? Hawking radiation predicts that black holes can slowly evaporate through the effective emission of a particle.  This particle is a real particle, as in, it is not a black hole itself.  I'll write this (a bit tongue-in-cheek) as follows, with $A$ being the emitted particle, and black hole prime being the black hole with slightly reduced mass.
$$\mbox{black hole} \rightarrow A +  \mbox{black hole}' $$
There is every reason to think this continues until the black hole stops being a black hole.  So we are left with a radiated particle and something else.  We don't know much about this process, but I think we can still limit it to a 2-product decay.
$$\mbox{black hole} \rightarrow A + B$$
What could the something else, $B$, be?  I don't know much about it, but I know that it is:


*

*Not a black hole

*A physically plausible particle


It might be more realistic to ask what other conditions should we impose on B?  I realize this is probably an unsolved problem.  Also, won't $A$ be really highly energetic?  How energetic?  Actually, what is $A$ to begin with?
 A: Most of the time while the black hole is evaporating, the "A" particles will be photons (or other mass-less particles like gravitons).  The reason for this is that the black hole emits radiation as if it were a black body and the temperature of the black body is inversely proportional to the black hole mass.  For black holes with mass equal to the mass of the sun the temperature would be 60 nano-kelvins.  So the energy of the particles emitted would have to be extremely low which is why they need to be mass-less particles like photons or gravitons.
Now in our universe (today), if the mass of the black hole is greater than about the mass of the moon, it would actually gain more energy from the cosmic microwave background radiation than it would lose to Hawking radiation since the black body temperature of black hole with a mass greater than the moon would be lower than the CMB black body temperature of 2.7 K.  The CMB temperature decreases over time so eventually all black holes will evaporate but it will take an extremely long time for this to happen.
However as the black hole gets smaller and smaller, the black body temperature rises so that eventually the temperature would rise so high that massive particles could be emitted. For a given amount of energy being emitted any particle that has a rest mass below that energy could be the emitted particle.  The reason for this is that the Hawking radiation is a result of the vacuum virtual pair creation in the vicinity of the event horizon.  Since all particles participate in the vacuum virtual pair creation, any particle that is compatible with that black body energy spectrum will be emitted.
When the mass of the black hole approaches zero, the black body temperature will approach infinity so the evaporation will be faster and faster with more and more energetic particles.  So the last two particles that would be emitted would be any 2 particles compatible with the remaining mass of the micro-black hole.
So if, for example, a micro-black hole could be created at the LHC it would evaporate very rapidly into an isotropic spray of particles of all types compatible with the energy of the black hole.  That would be the event signature that would be found by the LHC detectors.
See this Wikipedia article for more informaiton.
A: Our world is a quantum world so everything, including any stage of the Hawking evaporation, may only be predicted probabilistically. At the end of its life, a tiny black hole has a mass comparable to the Planck mass and such a tiny black hole becomes qualitatively the same thing as just another heavy unstable species of an elementary particle.
A question is whether or not you know the precise microstate of such a black hole. If you know it, you may predict the probabilities of different final products accurately from a well-defined compactification of string/M-theory you consider (without string/M-theory, you will clearly be able to make no precise predictions of the quantum gravity phenomena, and this is a textbook example of one). If you don't know the exact microstate is, it is still true that roughly speaking, the small black hole emits a thermal radiation. 
However, at the very end of the life of the black hole, its temperature goes up a lot. At the very end, the temperature is close to the Planck temperature (the highest possible temperature that may marginally be talked about in physics) so the decay products may include (with a high probability) very heavy particle species, too. Right before it disappears, a black hole may surely produce a pair of top quarks or even heavier particles. There's still a nonzero probability that it will decay to two photons or anything else that doesn't violate conservation laws.
Actually, the probability is nonzero that a black hole emits another, smaller black hole. It's just very unlikely: such a process is essentially suppressed by $\exp(-S)$ where $S$ is the entropy of the emitted black hole. 
For macroscopic black holes, such a factor is zero for all practical purposes. However, if you want to emit black holes that are slightly larger than the minimal (Planckian) black hole, the factor isn't hopelessly tiny and the emission of a small black hole is a possibility. Again, any black hole microstate may always be interpreted as yet another species of an elementary particle. Large black holes have a high entropy and the description in terms of "exponentially many new particle species" becomes contrived. However, for the smallest (Planckian) black holes, the description in terms of new particle species becomes a condition for any accurate description of the black hole's behavior.
A: There is no exact model of the endpoint of black hole evaporation. However, I am persuaded that Samir Mathur's "fuzzball" model of black holes is the right one. In a fuzzball, you don't have a singularity or even an event horizon, because the fuzzball physically extends to where the horizon would be found in classical general relativity. When Mathur constructs individual bound states corresponding to the extremal black holes found in string theory, they have this feature. 
So black holes are fuzzballs, and fuzzballs are bound states of strings and branes, and fuzzball evaporation results from these bound objects occasionally escaping, not from pair production at a nonexistent event horizon. The endpoint of fuzzball evaporation will be a fuzzball so small it is just an ordinary bound state. At this point FrankH's answer will apply: the black hole will have disintegrated into a spray of ordinary particles. But my point is that we apparently need the fuzzball description of black holes, which is still work in progress, in order to really understand what's going on. 
A: Black holes are in the news.  Thought I’d try my brain at explaining them.
                                               “Cycle Of Black Holes”

1.  “physics mathematics a point at which a function takes an infinite value, especially in space-time when matter is infinitely dense, as at the center of a black hole.” 
      In the beginning there was one singularity. The one singularity exploded resulting from reverse critical mass.  The universe is now in the state of infinite expansion.  Just as there is an infinite expansion of the universe the challenge to matter is that of reversing expansion.  The nature of matter is “gravitational attractant.”   Black holes are the key to this reversing process because black holes concentrate matter.   Black holes form from the spiral motion of galaxies.  Much like the spiral motion in a sink drain that focuses energy on one pivotal point.   In the eternal moment before reverse critical mass there was no light. Then God said or if your prefer natural law, “let there be light, the birth of the universe.  Black holes are the microcosm of the singularity.   Black holes will continue to grow and absorb more matter.  The universe will eventually be absorbed by black holes and black holes, in the process, will absorb each other.  This in time creates the gravitation pull warping space and time to return to where it all began, one singularity.   The universe is an “oscillating mechanism.”
