4
$\begingroup$

For nuclei, I know that it is the $J^{\pi}$ that is usually measured/calculated, which is the spin-parity. I don't see "orbital angular momentum" of a nucleus very often. Now my notion of spin vs. orbital angular momentum is that spin is entirely instrisic, while orbital angular momentum is more of a classical characteristic (by movement/orbit in a bit more of a literal sense).

Do nuclei even have orbital angular momentum? Is their magnetic moment-like properties only derived from its spin-parity, or am I mistaken? What's really throwing me off is that spin is always in half-integer units, whereas orbital angular momentum is 'always' in whole-integer units.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Couldn't it be that you confuse orbital angular momentum of the whole nucleus, with the orbital angular momentum of nucleons within the shell-model of nucleus? $\endgroup$
    – Sofia
    Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 18:38
  • $\begingroup$ That is very possible. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 23:11
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain what you mean by that? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ See Bill N's answer. $\endgroup$
    – Sofia
    Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 23:14
  • $\begingroup$ Oh no I mean like how does one determine the orbital angular momentum of an entire nucleus going around, let's say, another entire nucleus? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 23:16

4 Answers 4

5
$\begingroup$

The angular momentum of the nucleus is the combined contribution of the spin-orbit angular momenta of the constituent particles. In order for an entity to have orbital angular momentum of its own it must some conceptual orbit: electrons in the atom, protons and neutrons in the nucleus, atoms in a molecule. That's why the angular momentum of a nucleus is generally referred to as spin: there's no definable orbit when talking about a single nucleus.

The success of the nuclear shell model strongly supports that each nucleon has a spin-orbit ($\vec{j}$) angular momentum which it contributes, and like particles combine first. Each $j$ quantum number will be a half-integer, with like $|lj>$ pairs combining (in the energy ground state) to give zero spin contribution. All nuclei with even proton count (Z) and even neutron count (N=A-Z) have $0^+$ spin and parity in the ground state, the protons combining to zero and the neutrons combining to zero. All even-odds and odd-evens (referring to Z and N) have odd-half integer spin with a parity determined by the $l$ of the extra (odd) nucleon. Odd-odd nuclei have integer, usually non-zero, spin. The two half integer quantum numbers (from the odd proton and the odd neutron) combine for an integer.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ But the user didn't tell you whether he refers to a global orbiting of the nucleus, or to internal dynamics of the nucleus, i.e. of the constituents. $\endgroup$
    – Sofia
    Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 19:09
3
$\begingroup$

For a famous example of a nucleus with internal orbital angular momentum, consider the deuteron. Considerations of exchange symmetry, spin, and isospin demand that the deuteron have unit spin, rather than zero spin. However the pion-nucleon interaction, gleaned from neutron-proton scattering and deuteron formation, suggests that about 4% of the deuteron wavefunction is $D$-wave, with orbital angular momentum $L=2$. (The $P$-wave component, with $L=1$, would have negative parity, $(-1)^L$; the deuteron's parity is positive.)

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

In a Hydrogen atom, the "orbital angular momentum of electron" is in fact the relative orbital angular momentum. The nucleus (proton) turns around the common atomic center too, but in a smaller orbit. The atomic electron and the nucleus do not have certain individual orbital angular momenta. They are in mixed states. See my explanations here and here.

$\endgroup$
-2
$\begingroup$

It's made up of many particles. I would assume some of them "orbit" the center. I know many electron orbitals have angular momentum. The orbitals of nuclei are less well-understood, but I would expect the same is true.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.