So, when an image is out of focus the light of any given point of the object does not refocus exactly at one point on the screen, but is spread out around a region, such that the light of the image at any given point is a superposition of lights of surrounding points.

If this is the case, then it seems like no information about what light corresponds to what point hasn't been lost, only dispersed spatially.

Could a program retrieve that information without any loss?

up vote 3 down vote accepted

No, because you have no information on how far objects are, and that affects the spread of the light. If you were taking the photograph of a 2D plane (a painting for example), you probably could retrieve more information, but it would still have a considerable quality loss, since in the borders you don't have the entire spread, some would be out of the photograph and that would have an impact on the entire image after the processing, since all points depend on one another.

Given an unsharp image, you can use deconvolution to attempt to reconstruct the original image, but the resolution you obtain will be limited by the noise in the unsharp image. The theoretical limit for the case of astronomical images where the objective is to resolve double stars, is investigated in this paper.

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.