8
$\begingroup$

Recently a question was asked during a lecture about the possibility of thermally pumping a laser. The lecturer claimed that this is pretty impractical as typical transitions in the visible light range are of the order of a few eV and so the temperature required to excite these transitions would be of the order of $10^5K$. At these temperatures you are likely to destroy your gain medium and so render the method redundant.

This is all well and good but suspend belief for a moment that we do have some laser gain medium which can withstand these temperatures and we wish to try and build a laser and pump it via heating. I think there is a more fundamental reason why this wouldn't work.

Say we have three energy levels denoted by $|1\rangle,|2\rangle,|3\rangle$ with energy $E_1, E_2,E_3$ respectively. Say the lasing transition occurs between states $|2\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$.

If we look at the probability for each level to be occupied we have $$p_j=\frac{1}{Z}\exp\left(\frac{-E_j}{k_bT}\right)$$

Where $Z$ is the partition function.

So if we look at the relative populations between say levels $|3\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$, (we would like to pump from $|1\rangle$ into $|3\rangle$) then we would have

$$\frac{p_3}{p_1}=\exp\left( \frac{-\left(E_3-E_1\right)}{k_bT}\right)$$

In the limit of high $T$ we have that

$$\frac{p_3}{p_1}\approx1-\frac{E_3-E_1}{k_bT}\leq1$$

as $E_3>E_1$.

In the very best case scenario we would have a one to one ratio, so from this I have concluded that you can't build a laser based on heating alone. Essentially I am asking is there a way around this? I have done some research and haven't been able to find a counterexample online. Is there a loophole somewhere in the analysis above that allows this to be done?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ No, there is no way around it. One of the fundamental assumptions of the Boltzmann distribution is thermal equilibrium. An inverted population (required for lasing) actually has a negative temperature. $\endgroup$ – Chris Mueller Feb 10 '15 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ Comment is correct but remember as you mention it, Boltzmann distribution is only found at equilibrium. In non equilibrium case there is a chance(though very unlikely) that inverted population is achieved. However, it can not be sustained anyway. $\endgroup$ – Ronan Tarik Drevon Nov 23 '15 at 16:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I wonder what would happen, if E3 would have very high degeneracy compared to E1, so it would outweight the Boltzman factor? Would that count as a thermally driven laser, or an "entropy driven laser"? Is there such a thing? $\endgroup$ – Mikael Kuisma Nov 23 '15 at 17:41
2
+100
$\begingroup$

I'll take a stab at this, although I am not an expert in the laser fields.

  1. Negative temperatures likely do not work:

One concept that may seem closely related to the possible "thermal excitation of a laser" is that of "negative temperature". In a state of negative temperature higher energy levels have higher occupation probabilities than lower ones, similarly to an inversion of population in lasing media. However, states of negative temperature are very different from states of inverted population.

  • First, the former require a finite upper bound in the energy spectrum, such that all energy levels $E_n \le E_{max}$. Standard examples are spin systems that are only weakly interacting with (or are mostly decoupled from) other (motional) degrees of freedom. But negative temperature have been obtained in the lab even for motional degrees of freedom. Population inversion, on the other hand, can occur basically in any system.

  • Second, and most importantly, states of negative temperature are states of thermodynamic equilibrium: once established they do not need external input to be maintained. They are stable. Inverted population states are far-from-equilibrium states that must be maintained by an external power input. Once the input is removed, they relax to equilibrium.

The lasing process actually relies in part on this spontaneous decay to equilibrium and is itself a far-from-equilibrium process. This means it cannot be reproduced using negative temperature states that already are at equilibrium. See a similar explanation on this page from the group that authored the paper mentioned above.

  1. Thermal enabling

So, does this mean the concept of "thermal excitation of a laser" is doomed? I'd say no, provided thermal excitation is not understood as simply elevating the temperature of an equilibrium state and the thermal occupation probabilities. We can look instead for instances of "thermal enabling" of lasing processes, where higher temperatures create the necessary conditions one way or another. Here are a couple of examples:

  1. Random lasers

Certain random lasers based on dyes in colloidal media or liquid crystals can be controlled by means of temperature adjustments. In random lasers the medium itself functions as cavity and lasing is prompted by random diffusion of light causing cascade excitation of dye molecules. The gain is then determined by the photon scattering length and photon diffusion time. The latter two parameters, and therefore the gain, can be controlled by changing the scattering properties of the host colloidal or liquid crystal medium. For a system using liquid crystal the gain is simply conditioned by the crystal's temperature dependent phase (e.g., clear or opaque). This can work as "thermal enabling" of random lasing if the high-temperature phase is the working one (unfortunately in the example paper it is actually the other way around). For a colloidal medium, optical transparency is determined by the temperature dependent size of the colloidal nanoparticles. Random lasing occurs when the temperature is high enough to promote small colloidal aggregates and associated photon scattering, but low enough to prevent larger aggregates that obstruct scattering too much. So this is really "thermal enabling".

  1. Plasma & astrophysical lasers

Lasing has also been observed in highly vibrationally excited water molecules and in Rydberg 3-atomic hydrogen molecules from supersonically expanding plasmas as they formed from corresponding ionic species. For $H_2O$-rare gas mixtures it was found that the "molecular ion rotational temperature [was] near 100K and [the] vibrational temperature near 2000K". For $H_3$ lasing it was hypothesized that the process involves an "excimer-like population inversion mechanism". There may be other examples, but I am not familiar with the field. In any case, it stands to mind that such species can also arise in high-temperature plasmas and if so would qualify as thermally excited/enabled laser systems.

In the study mentioned above the author actually proposes that the $H_3$ lasing mechanism may have been relevant in the cooling of the first giant stars formed after the Big Bang and so in the formation of primordial galaxies. Another possible astrophysical occurrence he suggests is in "the atmospheres of low mass stars that are cool enough to have significant $H_2$ and that have large flares, shocks in molecular gas that are fast enough to produce significant ionization, and gamma ray bursts or X-ray flashes that impinge on molecular gas, such that the post-burst gas simultaneously has high ionization and a high $H_2$ content."

Related astrophysical masers and lasers are actually well-documented, but I think generally involve ultra-low density conditions that are too exotic to qualify as "thermal". Maybe someone more knowledgeable in the subject can correct or confirm.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The plasmas in which masers generally occur (i.e., upper corona, occasionally in the terrestrial auroral region, near the Jovian aurora, etc.) are considered collisionless or weakly collisional at best. They are non-equilibrium kinetic gases, so I am not sure how well that can apply to the OP, but waves can locally heat the particles. $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Nov 25 '15 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ @honeste_vivere Thanks for clarifying this. Do you know of any astrophysical lasers (higher frequency) where collisions may be important? $\endgroup$ – udrv Nov 26 '15 at 5:53
  • $\begingroup$ The only thing that would be laser-like that I can think of are synchrotron emissions near pulsars or magnetars, but I am not sure if that would actually qualify for what you are looking for... $\endgroup$ – honeste_vivere Nov 26 '15 at 14:41
-2
$\begingroup$

Regarding to your logic, the total amount of electrons at states with E2 and E3 altogether could be bigger than at ground state (with E1). It is inversion, isn't so?

Thus the thermal invertion could be realized in three-level scheme but it is impossible at two-level system.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ As far as I see, this is a valid attempt to answer the question. It's wrong, but that's a different matter. $\endgroup$ – Martin Nov 25 '15 at 16:28
-3
$\begingroup$

I don't agree with the comment of Chris Mueller - the same rule applies to other pumping methods as well. We cannot reach population inversion for states $|1\rangle$ and $|3\rangle$ no matter how we pump, but if lasing would happen from $|3\rangle$ to $|2\rangle$ and state $|2\rangle$ would quickly relax to $|1\rangle$ then we could get population inversion between $|3\rangle$ and $|2\rangle$.

The difficulty is to find a system with appropriate levels such that state $|2\rangle$ is unstable and cannot be thermally populated. For temperatures above 10000K you can think of excimer lasers - normaly they are pumped by a strong electric discharge, but if you imagine another way of heating the gas to such temperatures, it could also work.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.