0
$\begingroup$

I am confused about how one measures the dynamical variables (eg position) of a particle. I thought the wave function $\Psi(x,t)$ was the probability amplitude and $|\Psi(x,t)|^2$ represents the probability of finding a particle at that a given location and time.

But this information only gives us probabilities about position. What if I wanted to measure momentum? Do I get this info from the wave function too?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Fourier transform it! $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Feb 9 '15 at 20:33
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. In the position representation, you can use the momentum operator. $\endgroup$ – Dargscisyhp Feb 9 '15 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ simply just sandwich momentum operator with SE $\endgroup$ – aQuestion Feb 9 '15 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ What does it mean to be in a "position representation" or "momentum representation"? $\endgroup$ – Stan Shunpike Feb 9 '15 at 20:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @StanShunpike: The position representation is $\langle x|\psi\rangle=\psi(x)$. The momentum representation is $\langle p|\psi\rangle=\psi(p)$. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Unger Feb 9 '15 at 21:46
1
$\begingroup$

An observable that has a definite value is an eigenvalue of the operator. If $A$ is a hermitian matrix of which $|\psi\rangle$ is an eigenstate, we have $$\tag{1}A|\psi,a\rangle=a|\psi,a\rangle$$ You asked about the wave function, not the state vector, though. We can still get all the information we need from the wave function $\psi(x)=\langle x|\psi\rangle$, but we need to find a differential operator that corresponds to $A$. To do this, Fourier transform to $a$ space from $x$ space and find the operator that fulfills (1).

Suppose however that $|\psi\rangle$ is not an eigenstate. Then there exists no $a$ such that $$A|\psi\rangle=a|\psi\rangle$$ Instead, we have a probability distribution function $$P(a)=|\langle a|\psi\rangle|^2$$ where $|a\rangle$ is an eigenstate. This tells us the probability of our particle having $a$ between $a$ and $a+da$. To get $\psi(a)=\langle a|\psi\rangle$ is the trick then. We insert a full set of position eigenstates: $$\langle a|\psi\rangle=\int \langle a|x\rangle\langle x|\psi\rangle dx=\int \langle a|x\rangle\psi(x)dx$$ What is $\langle a|x\rangle$? We use the fact that $|x\rangle$ is Dirac normalizable: $$\int\frac{da}{2\pi}e^{ia(x-y)}=\delta(x-y)=\langle x|y\rangle=\int \langle x|a\rangle\langle a|y\rangle da$$ By inspection, we see $$\langle a|y\rangle=\frac{e^{-iay}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$$ Thus $$\psi(a)=\int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-iax}\psi(x)$$ Which is of course just the Fourier transform.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So, given an operator $A$, if an eigenstate exists, we write that eigenstate as $$A|\psi\rangle = a|\psi\rangle$$ by definition. Does an eigenstate always correspond to an observable? By "definite value", what do you mean? $\endgroup$ – Stan Shunpike Feb 15 '15 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ We preferably write $$A|\psi,a\rangle=a|\psi,a\rangle$$ or something similar. What you have is fine too. The $a$ labels the eigenstate. An observable refers to the operator. If there is no definite value, we get a PDF. For example, a wave packet does not have a definite position value. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Unger Feb 15 '15 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ What does the $,a$ add? Like what's its purpose? Also, so in my book by Griffiths, he uses $$Q\left(x,-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)$$ to denote an observable. Is it common to write the stuff in parentheses? I take it $A$ is our operator but I don't usually see $$A\left(x,-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)$$. I usually use hats because it keeps me certain what is an operator and what isn't. $\endgroup$ – Stan Shunpike Feb 15 '15 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ The $a$ lets us distinguish between a state $|\psi,a\rangle$ and a state $|\psi,a'\rangle$. I haven't read Griffiths' QM book, but I can hazard a guess as to what his notation means. $Q$ is the position operator. In the position basis it acts as $x$ and in the momentum basis it acts as $-i\hbar\partial_x$. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Unger Feb 15 '15 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ I bet you are right. I haven't seen him use it as a momentum operator. He just never explicitly called it the position operator when he introduced it. $\endgroup$ – Stan Shunpike Feb 15 '15 at 19:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.