2
$\begingroup$

In Quantum Mechanics coherent states are defined as eigenstates to some annihilation operator. Afaik this notion is due to Roy Glauber.

Now, I just read that if you have a spin-state for example, then the coherence of the spin-state is measured by the off-diagonal elements of the density matrix. This meant that there is no coherence if the off-diagonal entries are zero, because then I have just spin-up or spin-down.

Are these two notions related to each other, cause I currently don't see it.

If anything is unclear, please let me know.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your last sentence is not clear: "This meant that there is no coherence, if the off-diagonal entries are zero, cause then I have just spin-up or spin-down and some coherence otherwise." Do you mean that there is no coherent spin state? Or, do you mean that if the off-diagonal entries are zero we don't have a coherent state? Which one? $\endgroup$ – Sofia Feb 6 '15 at 15:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Sofia the latter one. $\endgroup$ – Xin Wang Feb 6 '15 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ If the off-diagonal entries are zero, of course you have a mixture od states, not a coherent superposition, but what means to you the phrase "because I have just spin up and spin down"? Anyway, see my answer. $\endgroup$ – Sofia Feb 6 '15 at 15:33
2
$\begingroup$

Coherent state is one thing and decoherence is something else.

The coherent state has the form

$ (\text I) \ |\alpha \rangle = e^{-\alpha ^2/2} \sum _n \frac {\alpha ^n}{\sqrt {n!}} |n \rangle.$

where $|n \rangle$ is a Fock state of n identical particles. This state is a coherent superposition of Fock states, and its density matrix has diagonal and non-diagonal elements.

Decoherence means that the density matrix is diagonal, i.e. you have a mixture, not a pure state in the form of quantum superposition.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ but how is this notion of decoherence related to the coherence we know from classical mechanics, where there has to be a constant phase difference between two objects or are all these ideas different from each other? $\endgroup$ – Xin Wang Feb 9 '15 at 18:43
  • $\begingroup$ @XinWang Yes, the notion of decoherence means that the coherence is destroyed. Here coherence is quite associated to the notion that you mention, a constant phase difference between two things. In quantum mechanics we say that we have a coherent superposition of two states, $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ when the global state is $\Psi = A(\psi_1 + Be^{i\phi}\psi_2)$, where A is some constant and B is a real and positive number. The difference in phase between $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ in this superposition is $\phi$. This is a coherent superposition, even if $\phi$ is not constant in time. (I continue) $\endgroup$ – Sofia Feb 9 '15 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ @XinWang For keeping the coherence it is sufficient that each system we create and obeys function $\Psi$, the difference in phase vary in time according to the same function $\phi (t)$. If these rules are respected, the density matrix of $\Psi$ has off-diagonal elements. Well, the decoherence erases the off-diagonals. We can't write anymore $\Psi$ as $A(\psi_1 + Be^{i\phi}\psi_2)$. What we get is a system which is either in the state $\psi_1$ or in the state $\psi_2$ with probabilities $|A|^2$, respectively $|A|^2 \ B^2$. Finally, as you see the coherent state has nothing to do with all this. $\endgroup$ – Sofia Feb 9 '15 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.