0
$\begingroup$

Why is it said that $\operatorname{sech}x$ (a transmission amplitude) has a simple pole on the imaginary axis?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you give some context? sech has no poles as far as I can tell, as it is a continuous, strictly positive, bound function. I would vote down but I can't. $\endgroup$
    – adavid
    Commented Oct 25, 2011 at 19:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @adavid, the imaginary axis! The poles are on the imaginary axis. $\endgroup$
    – user1631
    Commented Oct 25, 2011 at 20:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks @user1631. When I see $x$, I think $\mathbb{R}$. I guess $z$ would have got me on the right track. And next time, please do give some more context... $\endgroup$
    – adavid
    Commented Oct 25, 2011 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ Cross-posted from math.stackexchange.com/q/75756/11127 $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Nov 19, 2012 at 19:15

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

To have a simple pole at $a$ means that $f(z) \sim 1/(z-a)^{n}$, with $n=1$. I.e., the function does not diverge with $1/z^2$ or a larger power.

For more details on the poles of $\operatorname{sech}(z)$, check out this answer. As simple as the poles of $\operatorname{sech}(z)$ may be, there is an infinite amount of them (as many as there are zeroes to $\operatorname{cosh}(z)$).

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.